Python GUI App Distribution: written in wxPython, TKinter or QTPython GUI Application redistributionCross-platform gui toolkit for deploying Python applicationsPure python gui library?Developing GUIs in Python: Tkinter vs PyQtGood looking Python GUI toolkit for Snow Leopard(64 bit)Python: Attractive, clean, packagable windows GUI libraryIs wxPython Needed on the End User's ComputerGUI development for my c application . How to proceed?Considerations for python gui toolkit for app that queries remote database?Python - pythondiologue vs. tkinker vs. wxPython vs. pyQt

Why do modes sound so different, although they are basically the same as a mode of another scale?

Tiny image scraper for xkcd.com

To which country did MiGs in Top Gun belong?

Displaying minutes in HH:MM format

Why not use futuristic pavise ballistic shields for protection?

FHE: What is the difference between multiplicative depth and multiplicative level?

Given a specific computer system, is it possible to estimate the actual precise run time of a piece of Assembly code

Would there be balance issues if I allowed opportunity attacks against any creature, not just hostile ones?

Solve this icositetragram

Meaning of "educating the ice"

In chocolate terminology, what is the name of thinly sliced leaf-shaped toppings made from hot, smooth chocolate, used to form flower petals?

If the UK government illegally doesn't ask for article 50 extension, can parliament do it instead?

co-son-in-law or co-brother

How to annoymously report the Establishment Clause being broken?

Divide Numbers by 0

Can an intercepting fighter jet force a small propeller aircraft down without completely destroying it?

Sum of Infinite series with a Geometric series in multiply

Received email from ISP saying one of my devices has malware

Initializing a std::array with a constant value

How to run a command 1 out of N times in Bash

Which is the best password hashing algorithm in .NET Core?

Why do we need explainable AI?

Plotting level sets of the form f(x,y,c)==0

I have two helper functions that are the exact same, one executes and one doesn't. How come?



Python GUI App Distribution: written in wxPython, TKinter or QT


Python GUI Application redistributionCross-platform gui toolkit for deploying Python applicationsPure python gui library?Developing GUIs in Python: Tkinter vs PyQtGood looking Python GUI toolkit for Snow Leopard(64 bit)Python: Attractive, clean, packagable windows GUI libraryIs wxPython Needed on the End User's ComputerGUI development for my c application . How to proceed?Considerations for python gui toolkit for app that queries remote database?Python - pythondiologue vs. tkinker vs. wxPython vs. pyQt






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8















My question is about the easiness of distributing the GUI app across the platforms (Mac/Linux/Windows), and I want to know the one that makes the user's job easiest.



My current understanding is that Tkinter app is the easiest for the users (to install) because as long as the user has installed a Python in her box, my application should be ready to run on that box.



For GUI app written in wxPython or pyQT, the user needs to install wxWidget or QT in her box first, which is an extra step, and then install my GUI app. (But my Ubuntu box seems to have the wxWidget libraries and QT libraries installed by default, is that a norm or just Ubuntu distro is more friendly to users? I guess Windows and Mac probably does not provide them by defualt, ie. the users need to download and install them as an extra step)










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    There's no guarantee that tkinter will be available just because Python is. It's an extension module, and so can be split out into a separate package. The Mandriva Linux distribution does this, and there are probably others.

    – ekhumoro
    Oct 1 '12 at 11:52

















8















My question is about the easiness of distributing the GUI app across the platforms (Mac/Linux/Windows), and I want to know the one that makes the user's job easiest.



My current understanding is that Tkinter app is the easiest for the users (to install) because as long as the user has installed a Python in her box, my application should be ready to run on that box.



For GUI app written in wxPython or pyQT, the user needs to install wxWidget or QT in her box first, which is an extra step, and then install my GUI app. (But my Ubuntu box seems to have the wxWidget libraries and QT libraries installed by default, is that a norm or just Ubuntu distro is more friendly to users? I guess Windows and Mac probably does not provide them by defualt, ie. the users need to download and install them as an extra step)










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    There's no guarantee that tkinter will be available just because Python is. It's an extension module, and so can be split out into a separate package. The Mandriva Linux distribution does this, and there are probably others.

    – ekhumoro
    Oct 1 '12 at 11:52













8












8








8


3






My question is about the easiness of distributing the GUI app across the platforms (Mac/Linux/Windows), and I want to know the one that makes the user's job easiest.



My current understanding is that Tkinter app is the easiest for the users (to install) because as long as the user has installed a Python in her box, my application should be ready to run on that box.



For GUI app written in wxPython or pyQT, the user needs to install wxWidget or QT in her box first, which is an extra step, and then install my GUI app. (But my Ubuntu box seems to have the wxWidget libraries and QT libraries installed by default, is that a norm or just Ubuntu distro is more friendly to users? I guess Windows and Mac probably does not provide them by defualt, ie. the users need to download and install them as an extra step)










share|improve this question
















My question is about the easiness of distributing the GUI app across the platforms (Mac/Linux/Windows), and I want to know the one that makes the user's job easiest.



My current understanding is that Tkinter app is the easiest for the users (to install) because as long as the user has installed a Python in her box, my application should be ready to run on that box.



For GUI app written in wxPython or pyQT, the user needs to install wxWidget or QT in her box first, which is an extra step, and then install my GUI app. (But my Ubuntu box seems to have the wxWidget libraries and QT libraries installed by default, is that a norm or just Ubuntu distro is more friendly to users? I guess Windows and Mac probably does not provide them by defualt, ie. the users need to download and install them as an extra step)







python user-interface wxpython pyqt tkinter






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 1 '12 at 0:28







chen

















asked Oct 1 '12 at 0:22









chenchen

1,5983 gold badges23 silver badges45 bronze badges




1,5983 gold badges23 silver badges45 bronze badges










  • 2





    There's no guarantee that tkinter will be available just because Python is. It's an extension module, and so can be split out into a separate package. The Mandriva Linux distribution does this, and there are probably others.

    – ekhumoro
    Oct 1 '12 at 11:52












  • 2





    There's no guarantee that tkinter will be available just because Python is. It's an extension module, and so can be split out into a separate package. The Mandriva Linux distribution does this, and there are probably others.

    – ekhumoro
    Oct 1 '12 at 11:52







2




2





There's no guarantee that tkinter will be available just because Python is. It's an extension module, and so can be split out into a separate package. The Mandriva Linux distribution does this, and there are probably others.

– ekhumoro
Oct 1 '12 at 11:52





There's no guarantee that tkinter will be available just because Python is. It's an extension module, and so can be split out into a separate package. The Mandriva Linux distribution does this, and there are probably others.

– ekhumoro
Oct 1 '12 at 11:52












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8















If you're running Ubuntu, PyQt will be installed by default. Most linux distros will have one of PyGtk or PyQt installed by default. WxPython was most likely installed in your Ubuntu box as a dependency for some other package in your system.



If your target market is Linux, you can just create a deb or rpm package and that'll take care of the dependencies for your application.



For Windows and Mac(and even Linux if you're so inclined) you could bundle the python interpreter with your application and its libraries into a native executable format such
as .exe, .dmg or .elf using libraries like cx_freeze, py2exe and py2app. Once this is done, your user will not have to install python or any of your libraries.






share|improve this answer






















  • 6





    PyInstaller is multiplatform and supports many 3rd party libraries such as PyQt, wxPython out-of-the-box

    – jfs
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:32












  • PyInstaller works great too.

    – prabu
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:57


















4















Tkinter is the only one that's included with Python. wxPython and pyQT need both the wxWindows or QT libraries and the wxPython or pyQT libraries to be installed on the system.



However, Tk does not look very nice. If you're already making the user install Python, you could just as well have them install the libraries too. (Or maybe include an installer or something.)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I think the comment about the look of Tk is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit to choose, but what the deployment options are. Plus, the look of Tk is highly subjective, so it detracts from the answer, IMO.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:08






  • 3





    Besides, with the new ttk sub-library of Tkinter (available in Python 2.7+ or at pypi.python.org/pypi/pyttk), you can make Tkinter apps look pretty good.

    – Mike Driscoll
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:28


















2















If the app is going to be cross-platform I would suggest WxWidgets (wxpython). I have used it several times and it has never been a problem.



Nevertheless, you should create different installers for Windows, Mac and Linux. In Linux, use .deb or .rpm to take care of dependencies.



In Windows, I've always used py2exe to create an exe file. Py2exe works by attaching the python interpreter and the needed libraries, in this case wxWidgets.



Check this link for more information: http://www.py2exe.org/






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    I think the comment about choosing wxWidgets is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit is best, it's about deployment options. Saying "I choose X" when the question isn't about choosing "X" may invite up-votes and down-votes simply because somebody likes or dislikes wxPython. I think the question would be better if you stuck to the topic of deployment. Unless, however, you're specifically saying that wxPython is easier to deploy, in which case you should explain why.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:13













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f12666278%2fpython-gui-app-distribution-written-in-wxpython-tkinter-or-qt%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8















If you're running Ubuntu, PyQt will be installed by default. Most linux distros will have one of PyGtk or PyQt installed by default. WxPython was most likely installed in your Ubuntu box as a dependency for some other package in your system.



If your target market is Linux, you can just create a deb or rpm package and that'll take care of the dependencies for your application.



For Windows and Mac(and even Linux if you're so inclined) you could bundle the python interpreter with your application and its libraries into a native executable format such
as .exe, .dmg or .elf using libraries like cx_freeze, py2exe and py2app. Once this is done, your user will not have to install python or any of your libraries.






share|improve this answer






















  • 6





    PyInstaller is multiplatform and supports many 3rd party libraries such as PyQt, wxPython out-of-the-box

    – jfs
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:32












  • PyInstaller works great too.

    – prabu
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:57















8















If you're running Ubuntu, PyQt will be installed by default. Most linux distros will have one of PyGtk or PyQt installed by default. WxPython was most likely installed in your Ubuntu box as a dependency for some other package in your system.



If your target market is Linux, you can just create a deb or rpm package and that'll take care of the dependencies for your application.



For Windows and Mac(and even Linux if you're so inclined) you could bundle the python interpreter with your application and its libraries into a native executable format such
as .exe, .dmg or .elf using libraries like cx_freeze, py2exe and py2app. Once this is done, your user will not have to install python or any of your libraries.






share|improve this answer






















  • 6





    PyInstaller is multiplatform and supports many 3rd party libraries such as PyQt, wxPython out-of-the-box

    – jfs
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:32












  • PyInstaller works great too.

    – prabu
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:57













8














8










8









If you're running Ubuntu, PyQt will be installed by default. Most linux distros will have one of PyGtk or PyQt installed by default. WxPython was most likely installed in your Ubuntu box as a dependency for some other package in your system.



If your target market is Linux, you can just create a deb or rpm package and that'll take care of the dependencies for your application.



For Windows and Mac(and even Linux if you're so inclined) you could bundle the python interpreter with your application and its libraries into a native executable format such
as .exe, .dmg or .elf using libraries like cx_freeze, py2exe and py2app. Once this is done, your user will not have to install python or any of your libraries.






share|improve this answer















If you're running Ubuntu, PyQt will be installed by default. Most linux distros will have one of PyGtk or PyQt installed by default. WxPython was most likely installed in your Ubuntu box as a dependency for some other package in your system.



If your target market is Linux, you can just create a deb or rpm package and that'll take care of the dependencies for your application.



For Windows and Mac(and even Linux if you're so inclined) you could bundle the python interpreter with your application and its libraries into a native executable format such
as .exe, .dmg or .elf using libraries like cx_freeze, py2exe and py2app. Once this is done, your user will not have to install python or any of your libraries.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 28 at 1:41









omkar yadav

1211 silver badge6 bronze badges




1211 silver badge6 bronze badges










answered Oct 1 '12 at 5:38









prabuprabu

1806 bronze badges




1806 bronze badges










  • 6





    PyInstaller is multiplatform and supports many 3rd party libraries such as PyQt, wxPython out-of-the-box

    – jfs
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:32












  • PyInstaller works great too.

    – prabu
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:57












  • 6





    PyInstaller is multiplatform and supports many 3rd party libraries such as PyQt, wxPython out-of-the-box

    – jfs
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:32












  • PyInstaller works great too.

    – prabu
    Oct 1 '12 at 6:57







6




6





PyInstaller is multiplatform and supports many 3rd party libraries such as PyQt, wxPython out-of-the-box

– jfs
Oct 1 '12 at 6:32






PyInstaller is multiplatform and supports many 3rd party libraries such as PyQt, wxPython out-of-the-box

– jfs
Oct 1 '12 at 6:32














PyInstaller works great too.

– prabu
Oct 1 '12 at 6:57





PyInstaller works great too.

– prabu
Oct 1 '12 at 6:57













4















Tkinter is the only one that's included with Python. wxPython and pyQT need both the wxWindows or QT libraries and the wxPython or pyQT libraries to be installed on the system.



However, Tk does not look very nice. If you're already making the user install Python, you could just as well have them install the libraries too. (Or maybe include an installer or something.)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I think the comment about the look of Tk is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit to choose, but what the deployment options are. Plus, the look of Tk is highly subjective, so it detracts from the answer, IMO.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:08






  • 3





    Besides, with the new ttk sub-library of Tkinter (available in Python 2.7+ or at pypi.python.org/pypi/pyttk), you can make Tkinter apps look pretty good.

    – Mike Driscoll
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:28















4















Tkinter is the only one that's included with Python. wxPython and pyQT need both the wxWindows or QT libraries and the wxPython or pyQT libraries to be installed on the system.



However, Tk does not look very nice. If you're already making the user install Python, you could just as well have them install the libraries too. (Or maybe include an installer or something.)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I think the comment about the look of Tk is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit to choose, but what the deployment options are. Plus, the look of Tk is highly subjective, so it detracts from the answer, IMO.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:08






  • 3





    Besides, with the new ttk sub-library of Tkinter (available in Python 2.7+ or at pypi.python.org/pypi/pyttk), you can make Tkinter apps look pretty good.

    – Mike Driscoll
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:28













4














4










4









Tkinter is the only one that's included with Python. wxPython and pyQT need both the wxWindows or QT libraries and the wxPython or pyQT libraries to be installed on the system.



However, Tk does not look very nice. If you're already making the user install Python, you could just as well have them install the libraries too. (Or maybe include an installer or something.)






share|improve this answer













Tkinter is the only one that's included with Python. wxPython and pyQT need both the wxWindows or QT libraries and the wxPython or pyQT libraries to be installed on the system.



However, Tk does not look very nice. If you're already making the user install Python, you could just as well have them install the libraries too. (Or maybe include an installer or something.)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Oct 1 '12 at 0:42









marinusmarinus

7815 silver badges15 bronze badges




7815 silver badges15 bronze badges










  • 1





    I think the comment about the look of Tk is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit to choose, but what the deployment options are. Plus, the look of Tk is highly subjective, so it detracts from the answer, IMO.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:08






  • 3





    Besides, with the new ttk sub-library of Tkinter (available in Python 2.7+ or at pypi.python.org/pypi/pyttk), you can make Tkinter apps look pretty good.

    – Mike Driscoll
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:28












  • 1





    I think the comment about the look of Tk is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit to choose, but what the deployment options are. Plus, the look of Tk is highly subjective, so it detracts from the answer, IMO.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:08






  • 3





    Besides, with the new ttk sub-library of Tkinter (available in Python 2.7+ or at pypi.python.org/pypi/pyttk), you can make Tkinter apps look pretty good.

    – Mike Driscoll
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:28







1




1





I think the comment about the look of Tk is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit to choose, but what the deployment options are. Plus, the look of Tk is highly subjective, so it detracts from the answer, IMO.

– Bryan Oakley
Oct 1 '12 at 16:08





I think the comment about the look of Tk is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit to choose, but what the deployment options are. Plus, the look of Tk is highly subjective, so it detracts from the answer, IMO.

– Bryan Oakley
Oct 1 '12 at 16:08




3




3





Besides, with the new ttk sub-library of Tkinter (available in Python 2.7+ or at pypi.python.org/pypi/pyttk), you can make Tkinter apps look pretty good.

– Mike Driscoll
Oct 2 '12 at 13:28





Besides, with the new ttk sub-library of Tkinter (available in Python 2.7+ or at pypi.python.org/pypi/pyttk), you can make Tkinter apps look pretty good.

– Mike Driscoll
Oct 2 '12 at 13:28











2















If the app is going to be cross-platform I would suggest WxWidgets (wxpython). I have used it several times and it has never been a problem.



Nevertheless, you should create different installers for Windows, Mac and Linux. In Linux, use .deb or .rpm to take care of dependencies.



In Windows, I've always used py2exe to create an exe file. Py2exe works by attaching the python interpreter and the needed libraries, in this case wxWidgets.



Check this link for more information: http://www.py2exe.org/






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    I think the comment about choosing wxWidgets is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit is best, it's about deployment options. Saying "I choose X" when the question isn't about choosing "X" may invite up-votes and down-votes simply because somebody likes or dislikes wxPython. I think the question would be better if you stuck to the topic of deployment. Unless, however, you're specifically saying that wxPython is easier to deploy, in which case you should explain why.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:13















2















If the app is going to be cross-platform I would suggest WxWidgets (wxpython). I have used it several times and it has never been a problem.



Nevertheless, you should create different installers for Windows, Mac and Linux. In Linux, use .deb or .rpm to take care of dependencies.



In Windows, I've always used py2exe to create an exe file. Py2exe works by attaching the python interpreter and the needed libraries, in this case wxWidgets.



Check this link for more information: http://www.py2exe.org/






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    I think the comment about choosing wxWidgets is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit is best, it's about deployment options. Saying "I choose X" when the question isn't about choosing "X" may invite up-votes and down-votes simply because somebody likes or dislikes wxPython. I think the question would be better if you stuck to the topic of deployment. Unless, however, you're specifically saying that wxPython is easier to deploy, in which case you should explain why.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:13













2














2










2









If the app is going to be cross-platform I would suggest WxWidgets (wxpython). I have used it several times and it has never been a problem.



Nevertheless, you should create different installers for Windows, Mac and Linux. In Linux, use .deb or .rpm to take care of dependencies.



In Windows, I've always used py2exe to create an exe file. Py2exe works by attaching the python interpreter and the needed libraries, in this case wxWidgets.



Check this link for more information: http://www.py2exe.org/






share|improve this answer















If the app is going to be cross-platform I would suggest WxWidgets (wxpython). I have used it several times and it has never been a problem.



Nevertheless, you should create different installers for Windows, Mac and Linux. In Linux, use .deb or .rpm to take care of dependencies.



In Windows, I've always used py2exe to create an exe file. Py2exe works by attaching the python interpreter and the needed libraries, in this case wxWidgets.



Check this link for more information: http://www.py2exe.org/







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Oct 1 '12 at 11:24









Littm

4,7453 gold badges24 silver badges34 bronze badges




4,7453 gold badges24 silver badges34 bronze badges










answered Oct 1 '12 at 8:00









santisanti

3414 silver badges14 bronze badges




3414 silver badges14 bronze badges










  • 1





    I think the comment about choosing wxWidgets is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit is best, it's about deployment options. Saying "I choose X" when the question isn't about choosing "X" may invite up-votes and down-votes simply because somebody likes or dislikes wxPython. I think the question would be better if you stuck to the topic of deployment. Unless, however, you're specifically saying that wxPython is easier to deploy, in which case you should explain why.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:13












  • 1





    I think the comment about choosing wxWidgets is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit is best, it's about deployment options. Saying "I choose X" when the question isn't about choosing "X" may invite up-votes and down-votes simply because somebody likes or dislikes wxPython. I think the question would be better if you stuck to the topic of deployment. Unless, however, you're specifically saying that wxPython is easier to deploy, in which case you should explain why.

    – Bryan Oakley
    Oct 1 '12 at 16:13







1




1





I think the comment about choosing wxWidgets is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit is best, it's about deployment options. Saying "I choose X" when the question isn't about choosing "X" may invite up-votes and down-votes simply because somebody likes or dislikes wxPython. I think the question would be better if you stuck to the topic of deployment. Unless, however, you're specifically saying that wxPython is easier to deploy, in which case you should explain why.

– Bryan Oakley
Oct 1 '12 at 16:13





I think the comment about choosing wxWidgets is out of place here. The question isn't about which toolkit is best, it's about deployment options. Saying "I choose X" when the question isn't about choosing "X" may invite up-votes and down-votes simply because somebody likes or dislikes wxPython. I think the question would be better if you stuck to the topic of deployment. Unless, however, you're specifically saying that wxPython is easier to deploy, in which case you should explain why.

– Bryan Oakley
Oct 1 '12 at 16:13

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f12666278%2fpython-gui-app-distribution-written-in-wxpython-tkinter-or-qt%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

Swift 4 - func physicsWorld not invoked on collision? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to call Objective-C code from Swift#ifdef replacement in the Swift language@selector() in Swift?#pragma mark in Swift?Swift for loop: for index, element in array?dispatch_after - GCD in Swift?Swift Beta performance: sorting arraysSplit a String into an array in Swift?The use of Swift 3 @objc inference in Swift 4 mode is deprecated?How to optimize UITableViewCell, because my UITableView lags

Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript