Why did the Mercure fail?Why did the Ju-87 Stuka have a siren?How much did Avgas cost in 1940?Why did the Junkers Ju-52 have corrugated external surfaces?Why didn't the Boeing 757 share the 767 fuselage?Why does it take so long to develop modern military jets?Why did the turbojet replace the piston engine?Could Mach 1.4 be a better design point for SST?Why is there still a preference for turboprop airliners over the new regional jets?Why aren't there any widebody propliners for the high-density short-haul markets?Why did Lockheed abandon the Constellation II?

Which European Languages are not Indo-European?

How to keep consistency across the application architecture as a team grows?

How to melt snow without fire or using body heat?

Cardio work for Muay Thai fighters

A burglar's sunglasses, a lady's odyssey

Why does the hash of infinity have the digits of π?

How was Daenerys able to legitimise Gendry?

USPS Back Room - Trespassing?

Can a ring of spell storing and access to Find spells produce an endless menagerie?

Time complexity of an algorithm: Is it important to state the base of the logarithm?

How did NASA Langley end up with the first 737?

Is there any chance a man can get the death penalty for causing a miscarriage?

Is there an idiom that means that you are in a very strong negotiation position in a negotiation?

Is it legal to have an abortion in another state or abroad?

Why did Jon Snow admit his fault in S08E06?

Removing the last element of a list

What would prevent living skin from being a good conductor for magic?

How to determine if a hyphen (-) exists inside a column

Gravitational Force Between Numbers

What were the Ethiopians doing in Xerxes' army?

Are cells guaranteed to get at least one mitochondrion when they divide?

How would a developer who mostly fixed bugs for years at a company call out their contributions in their CV?

What is the use case for non-breathable waterproof pants?

Shorten or merge multiple lines of `&> /dev/null &`



Why did the Mercure fail?


Why did the Ju-87 Stuka have a siren?How much did Avgas cost in 1940?Why did the Junkers Ju-52 have corrugated external surfaces?Why didn't the Boeing 757 share the 767 fuselage?Why does it take so long to develop modern military jets?Why did the turbojet replace the piston engine?Could Mach 1.4 be a better design point for SST?Why is there still a preference for turboprop airliners over the new regional jets?Why aren't there any widebody propliners for the high-density short-haul markets?Why did Lockheed abandon the Constellation II?













5












$begingroup$


The Dassault Mercure was a French regional jet that first flew in 1971 and received its type certificate in February 1974; it resembled an enlarged, shorter-range 737-200, and was designed to serve higher-capacity short-haul routes. The Mercure was an abysmal failure, with only eleven aircraft ever sold, all to French domestic carrier Air Inter. Wikipedia states, citing Dassault’s own website, that the killer was its short range, only 2,080 km (1,125 nmi) with a typical payload, and reducing to 1,700 km (920 nmi) at maximum capacity.



Except... that doesn’t actually explain the Mercure’s failure to sell!



Sure, it didn’t have the range for long transcontinental or transoceanic crossings, but you don’t need that much range to be successful as an airliner, as evidenced by the profits made by regional-jet manufacturers. The Mercure’s Wikipedia article - citing Dassault - admits as much, even as it makes the claim that the aircraft was doomed by its short range:




This lack of interest was due to several factors, including the devaluation of the dollar and the oil crisis of the 1970s, but mainly because of the Mercure's operating range – suitable for domestic European operations but unable to sustain longer routes; at maximum payload, the aircraft's range was only 1,700 km. [emphasis added]




1,700 km is plenty of range for European routes, and there are numerous other markets for high-capacity, short-range aircraft. Japan, land of the 747 regional jet, comes immediately to mind, along with the other dense areas of East, Southeast, and South Asia and the Middle East. Even infamously-spread-out North America should have been fertile ground, what with the multitudes of short routes (and even not-so-short ones; the Mercure would have had enough range to comfortably fly between New York and Chicago in a typical passenger configuration, although not in all-up sardine mode) in the northeastern and midwestern United States, eastern Canada, parts of the South, the West Coast, and the Caribbean. As a point of comparison, the earlier Sud Caravelle - the fourth jetliner to enter revenue service,1 and the first-ever regional jet - had an even shorter range (1,700 km was its maximum range), and it was riotously successful, to the tune of 282 aircraft (some of the very last of these, ironically, going to Air Inter at the very same time they were contemplating the Mercure), despite also having a smaller passenger capacity.



What am I missing? Why wasn’t the Dassault Mercure successful in the short-haul market?




1: Preceded by the Comet, the Tu-104, and the 707, in that order.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    The Dassault Mercure was a French regional jet that first flew in 1971 and received its type certificate in February 1974; it resembled an enlarged, shorter-range 737-200, and was designed to serve higher-capacity short-haul routes. The Mercure was an abysmal failure, with only eleven aircraft ever sold, all to French domestic carrier Air Inter. Wikipedia states, citing Dassault’s own website, that the killer was its short range, only 2,080 km (1,125 nmi) with a typical payload, and reducing to 1,700 km (920 nmi) at maximum capacity.



    Except... that doesn’t actually explain the Mercure’s failure to sell!



    Sure, it didn’t have the range for long transcontinental or transoceanic crossings, but you don’t need that much range to be successful as an airliner, as evidenced by the profits made by regional-jet manufacturers. The Mercure’s Wikipedia article - citing Dassault - admits as much, even as it makes the claim that the aircraft was doomed by its short range:




    This lack of interest was due to several factors, including the devaluation of the dollar and the oil crisis of the 1970s, but mainly because of the Mercure's operating range – suitable for domestic European operations but unable to sustain longer routes; at maximum payload, the aircraft's range was only 1,700 km. [emphasis added]




    1,700 km is plenty of range for European routes, and there are numerous other markets for high-capacity, short-range aircraft. Japan, land of the 747 regional jet, comes immediately to mind, along with the other dense areas of East, Southeast, and South Asia and the Middle East. Even infamously-spread-out North America should have been fertile ground, what with the multitudes of short routes (and even not-so-short ones; the Mercure would have had enough range to comfortably fly between New York and Chicago in a typical passenger configuration, although not in all-up sardine mode) in the northeastern and midwestern United States, eastern Canada, parts of the South, the West Coast, and the Caribbean. As a point of comparison, the earlier Sud Caravelle - the fourth jetliner to enter revenue service,1 and the first-ever regional jet - had an even shorter range (1,700 km was its maximum range), and it was riotously successful, to the tune of 282 aircraft (some of the very last of these, ironically, going to Air Inter at the very same time they were contemplating the Mercure), despite also having a smaller passenger capacity.



    What am I missing? Why wasn’t the Dassault Mercure successful in the short-haul market?




    1: Preceded by the Comet, the Tu-104, and the 707, in that order.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      The Dassault Mercure was a French regional jet that first flew in 1971 and received its type certificate in February 1974; it resembled an enlarged, shorter-range 737-200, and was designed to serve higher-capacity short-haul routes. The Mercure was an abysmal failure, with only eleven aircraft ever sold, all to French domestic carrier Air Inter. Wikipedia states, citing Dassault’s own website, that the killer was its short range, only 2,080 km (1,125 nmi) with a typical payload, and reducing to 1,700 km (920 nmi) at maximum capacity.



      Except... that doesn’t actually explain the Mercure’s failure to sell!



      Sure, it didn’t have the range for long transcontinental or transoceanic crossings, but you don’t need that much range to be successful as an airliner, as evidenced by the profits made by regional-jet manufacturers. The Mercure’s Wikipedia article - citing Dassault - admits as much, even as it makes the claim that the aircraft was doomed by its short range:




      This lack of interest was due to several factors, including the devaluation of the dollar and the oil crisis of the 1970s, but mainly because of the Mercure's operating range – suitable for domestic European operations but unable to sustain longer routes; at maximum payload, the aircraft's range was only 1,700 km. [emphasis added]




      1,700 km is plenty of range for European routes, and there are numerous other markets for high-capacity, short-range aircraft. Japan, land of the 747 regional jet, comes immediately to mind, along with the other dense areas of East, Southeast, and South Asia and the Middle East. Even infamously-spread-out North America should have been fertile ground, what with the multitudes of short routes (and even not-so-short ones; the Mercure would have had enough range to comfortably fly between New York and Chicago in a typical passenger configuration, although not in all-up sardine mode) in the northeastern and midwestern United States, eastern Canada, parts of the South, the West Coast, and the Caribbean. As a point of comparison, the earlier Sud Caravelle - the fourth jetliner to enter revenue service,1 and the first-ever regional jet - had an even shorter range (1,700 km was its maximum range), and it was riotously successful, to the tune of 282 aircraft (some of the very last of these, ironically, going to Air Inter at the very same time they were contemplating the Mercure), despite also having a smaller passenger capacity.



      What am I missing? Why wasn’t the Dassault Mercure successful in the short-haul market?




      1: Preceded by the Comet, the Tu-104, and the 707, in that order.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The Dassault Mercure was a French regional jet that first flew in 1971 and received its type certificate in February 1974; it resembled an enlarged, shorter-range 737-200, and was designed to serve higher-capacity short-haul routes. The Mercure was an abysmal failure, with only eleven aircraft ever sold, all to French domestic carrier Air Inter. Wikipedia states, citing Dassault’s own website, that the killer was its short range, only 2,080 km (1,125 nmi) with a typical payload, and reducing to 1,700 km (920 nmi) at maximum capacity.



      Except... that doesn’t actually explain the Mercure’s failure to sell!



      Sure, it didn’t have the range for long transcontinental or transoceanic crossings, but you don’t need that much range to be successful as an airliner, as evidenced by the profits made by regional-jet manufacturers. The Mercure’s Wikipedia article - citing Dassault - admits as much, even as it makes the claim that the aircraft was doomed by its short range:




      This lack of interest was due to several factors, including the devaluation of the dollar and the oil crisis of the 1970s, but mainly because of the Mercure's operating range – suitable for domestic European operations but unable to sustain longer routes; at maximum payload, the aircraft's range was only 1,700 km. [emphasis added]




      1,700 km is plenty of range for European routes, and there are numerous other markets for high-capacity, short-range aircraft. Japan, land of the 747 regional jet, comes immediately to mind, along with the other dense areas of East, Southeast, and South Asia and the Middle East. Even infamously-spread-out North America should have been fertile ground, what with the multitudes of short routes (and even not-so-short ones; the Mercure would have had enough range to comfortably fly between New York and Chicago in a typical passenger configuration, although not in all-up sardine mode) in the northeastern and midwestern United States, eastern Canada, parts of the South, the West Coast, and the Caribbean. As a point of comparison, the earlier Sud Caravelle - the fourth jetliner to enter revenue service,1 and the first-ever regional jet - had an even shorter range (1,700 km was its maximum range), and it was riotously successful, to the tune of 282 aircraft (some of the very last of these, ironically, going to Air Inter at the very same time they were contemplating the Mercure), despite also having a smaller passenger capacity.



      What am I missing? Why wasn’t the Dassault Mercure successful in the short-haul market?




      1: Preceded by the Comet, the Tu-104, and the 707, in that order.







      airliner aviation-history regional-jet






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 23 at 20:24









      SeanSean

      6,91243391




      6,91243391




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Mainly because the short haul market needed to wait for the deregulation of the late 70s into the early 80s that resulted in the creation, by the early 90s, of the hub and spoke concept with small regional jets feeding hubs where the mainliners were.



          The CRJ200 was the main pioneer of this market, as an up to date rendition of a smaller regional feeder jet. At the time it was expected to sell maybe a couple hundred units, even within Canadair.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There never was a hub and spoke system in Europe, or US style deregulation.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 25 at 5:25










          • $begingroup$
            But the US is the dominant market. The European consumer air travel market is much smaller because there is still a lot of train travel, which is almost non-existent in NA.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            Mar 25 at 13:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            which is irrelevant as the Mercure wasn't primarily targeted at the US market, but the European and former colonial French markets.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 26 at 4:18










          • $begingroup$
            @jwenting: Actually, Dassault did try to sell an updated, CFM56-powered Mercure in the U.S., but didn't get any orders.
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 27 at 4:29










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnK: And yet the even-earlier Caravelle was a roaring success...
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 30 at 20:50











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "528"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61537%2fwhy-did-the-mercure-fail%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Mainly because the short haul market needed to wait for the deregulation of the late 70s into the early 80s that resulted in the creation, by the early 90s, of the hub and spoke concept with small regional jets feeding hubs where the mainliners were.



          The CRJ200 was the main pioneer of this market, as an up to date rendition of a smaller regional feeder jet. At the time it was expected to sell maybe a couple hundred units, even within Canadair.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There never was a hub and spoke system in Europe, or US style deregulation.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 25 at 5:25










          • $begingroup$
            But the US is the dominant market. The European consumer air travel market is much smaller because there is still a lot of train travel, which is almost non-existent in NA.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            Mar 25 at 13:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            which is irrelevant as the Mercure wasn't primarily targeted at the US market, but the European and former colonial French markets.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 26 at 4:18










          • $begingroup$
            @jwenting: Actually, Dassault did try to sell an updated, CFM56-powered Mercure in the U.S., but didn't get any orders.
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 27 at 4:29










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnK: And yet the even-earlier Caravelle was a roaring success...
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 30 at 20:50















          4












          $begingroup$

          Mainly because the short haul market needed to wait for the deregulation of the late 70s into the early 80s that resulted in the creation, by the early 90s, of the hub and spoke concept with small regional jets feeding hubs where the mainliners were.



          The CRJ200 was the main pioneer of this market, as an up to date rendition of a smaller regional feeder jet. At the time it was expected to sell maybe a couple hundred units, even within Canadair.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There never was a hub and spoke system in Europe, or US style deregulation.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 25 at 5:25










          • $begingroup$
            But the US is the dominant market. The European consumer air travel market is much smaller because there is still a lot of train travel, which is almost non-existent in NA.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            Mar 25 at 13:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            which is irrelevant as the Mercure wasn't primarily targeted at the US market, but the European and former colonial French markets.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 26 at 4:18










          • $begingroup$
            @jwenting: Actually, Dassault did try to sell an updated, CFM56-powered Mercure in the U.S., but didn't get any orders.
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 27 at 4:29










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnK: And yet the even-earlier Caravelle was a roaring success...
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 30 at 20:50













          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Mainly because the short haul market needed to wait for the deregulation of the late 70s into the early 80s that resulted in the creation, by the early 90s, of the hub and spoke concept with small regional jets feeding hubs where the mainliners were.



          The CRJ200 was the main pioneer of this market, as an up to date rendition of a smaller regional feeder jet. At the time it was expected to sell maybe a couple hundred units, even within Canadair.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Mainly because the short haul market needed to wait for the deregulation of the late 70s into the early 80s that resulted in the creation, by the early 90s, of the hub and spoke concept with small regional jets feeding hubs where the mainliners were.



          The CRJ200 was the main pioneer of this market, as an up to date rendition of a smaller regional feeder jet. At the time it was expected to sell maybe a couple hundred units, even within Canadair.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 23 at 21:04









          Sean

          6,91243391




          6,91243391










          answered Mar 23 at 21:04









          John KJohn K

          29.2k14691




          29.2k14691







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There never was a hub and spoke system in Europe, or US style deregulation.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 25 at 5:25










          • $begingroup$
            But the US is the dominant market. The European consumer air travel market is much smaller because there is still a lot of train travel, which is almost non-existent in NA.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            Mar 25 at 13:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            which is irrelevant as the Mercure wasn't primarily targeted at the US market, but the European and former colonial French markets.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 26 at 4:18










          • $begingroup$
            @jwenting: Actually, Dassault did try to sell an updated, CFM56-powered Mercure in the U.S., but didn't get any orders.
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 27 at 4:29










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnK: And yet the even-earlier Caravelle was a roaring success...
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 30 at 20:50












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There never was a hub and spoke system in Europe, or US style deregulation.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 25 at 5:25










          • $begingroup$
            But the US is the dominant market. The European consumer air travel market is much smaller because there is still a lot of train travel, which is almost non-existent in NA.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            Mar 25 at 13:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            which is irrelevant as the Mercure wasn't primarily targeted at the US market, but the European and former colonial French markets.
            $endgroup$
            – jwenting
            Mar 26 at 4:18










          • $begingroup$
            @jwenting: Actually, Dassault did try to sell an updated, CFM56-powered Mercure in the U.S., but didn't get any orders.
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 27 at 4:29










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnK: And yet the even-earlier Caravelle was a roaring success...
            $endgroup$
            – Sean
            Mar 30 at 20:50







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          There never was a hub and spoke system in Europe, or US style deregulation.
          $endgroup$
          – jwenting
          Mar 25 at 5:25




          $begingroup$
          There never was a hub and spoke system in Europe, or US style deregulation.
          $endgroup$
          – jwenting
          Mar 25 at 5:25












          $begingroup$
          But the US is the dominant market. The European consumer air travel market is much smaller because there is still a lot of train travel, which is almost non-existent in NA.
          $endgroup$
          – John K
          Mar 25 at 13:47




          $begingroup$
          But the US is the dominant market. The European consumer air travel market is much smaller because there is still a lot of train travel, which is almost non-existent in NA.
          $endgroup$
          – John K
          Mar 25 at 13:47




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          which is irrelevant as the Mercure wasn't primarily targeted at the US market, but the European and former colonial French markets.
          $endgroup$
          – jwenting
          Mar 26 at 4:18




          $begingroup$
          which is irrelevant as the Mercure wasn't primarily targeted at the US market, but the European and former colonial French markets.
          $endgroup$
          – jwenting
          Mar 26 at 4:18












          $begingroup$
          @jwenting: Actually, Dassault did try to sell an updated, CFM56-powered Mercure in the U.S., but didn't get any orders.
          $endgroup$
          – Sean
          Mar 27 at 4:29




          $begingroup$
          @jwenting: Actually, Dassault did try to sell an updated, CFM56-powered Mercure in the U.S., but didn't get any orders.
          $endgroup$
          – Sean
          Mar 27 at 4:29












          $begingroup$
          @JohnK: And yet the even-earlier Caravelle was a roaring success...
          $endgroup$
          – Sean
          Mar 30 at 20:50




          $begingroup$
          @JohnK: And yet the even-earlier Caravelle was a roaring success...
          $endgroup$
          – Sean
          Mar 30 at 20:50

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61537%2fwhy-did-the-mercure-fail%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

          Swift 4 - func physicsWorld not invoked on collision? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to call Objective-C code from Swift#ifdef replacement in the Swift language@selector() in Swift?#pragma mark in Swift?Swift for loop: for index, element in array?dispatch_after - GCD in Swift?Swift Beta performance: sorting arraysSplit a String into an array in Swift?The use of Swift 3 @objc inference in Swift 4 mode is deprecated?How to optimize UITableViewCell, because my UITableView lags

          Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript