How to select columns based on count of number of records returned?How do I perform an IF…THEN in an SQL SELECT?How to return only the Date from a SQL Server DateTime datatypeHow do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering?How can I SELECT rows with MAX(Column value), DISTINCT by another column in SQL?SQL exclude a column using SELECT * [except columnA] FROM tableA?How do I UPDATE from a SELECT in SQL Server?'IF' in 'SELECT' statement - choose output value based on column valuesSQL select only rows with max value on a columnSQL - Select distinct based on specific columnsHow do I select each row from a table, ordering them by the most “recent (timestamp)” associated row in join table?

How can a drink contain 1.8 kcal energy while 0 g fat/carbs/protein?

Cauchy reals and Dedekind reals satisfy "the same mathematical theorems"

Do dragons smell of lilacs?

ArcPy Delete Function not working inside for loop?

Playing saxophone without using the octave key

Wordplay subtraction paradox

Mortgage as present value of resale worth

Is it okay for a chapter's POV to shift as it progresses?

How to find abandoned railways in Google Maps?

What is the meaning of [[:space:]] in bash?

What "fuel more powerful than anything the West (had) in stock" put Laika in orbit aboard Sputnik 2?

How can electric field be defined as force per charge, if the charge makes its own, singular electric field?

Which GPUs to get for Mathematical Optimization (if any...)?

Does inertia keep a rotating object rotating forever, or something else?

Is the purpose of sheet music to be played along to? Or a guide for learning and reference during playing?

How many bits in the resultant hash will change, if the x bits are changed in its the original input?

Can a Resident Assistant be told to ignore a lawful order?'

Why do so many pure math PhD students drop out or leave academia, compared to applied mathematics PhDs?

Did Voldemort kill his father before finding out about Horcruxes?

What prompted Cuba to fight against South African Imperialism?

Alternator dying so junk car?

Sending a photo of my bank account card to the future employer

Increasing muscle power without increasing volume

What happens if there is no space for entry stamp in the passport for US visa?



How to select columns based on count of number of records returned?


How do I perform an IF…THEN in an SQL SELECT?How to return only the Date from a SQL Server DateTime datatypeHow do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering?How can I SELECT rows with MAX(Column value), DISTINCT by another column in SQL?SQL exclude a column using SELECT * [except columnA] FROM tableA?How do I UPDATE from a SELECT in SQL Server?'IF' in 'SELECT' statement - choose output value based on column valuesSQL select only rows with max value on a columnSQL - Select distinct based on specific columnsHow do I select each row from a table, ordering them by the most “recent (timestamp)” associated row in join table?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















This is the table I have



| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


Desired Result:



TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210
TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101
LI-LIN2/V001/66850/20180101


Requirements/Conditions:



Having prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd as key columns,



  1. Delete duplicates according to rtgTypeCd, rtgGrpCd, rtgNodeNum, parmVldFromDt, charVal


  2. If no records found, do nothing.


  3. If one record found, take ritmValFromDt for concatenation



  4. If multiple records found, see how many records have parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt



    4.1. If one record found, then use ritmValFromDt for concatenation.



    4.2. If multiple records found, then use parmVldFromDt for concatenation.




Intermediate result which I am using for explanation:



SELECT distinct * from mytable;

| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


From the above table, now I should reduce it to the following final table, which I will use for concatenation.



| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


EDIT: Further explanation:




  • V001|96228|TO-HCH2 comes under condition 4.2.


  • V003|197774|TOU-A16 comes under condition 4.1.


  • V001|66850|LI-LIN2 I think this condition comes by choosing ritmValFromDt since that's the greater one and we don't have any record for this combination having parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt But I'm not certain about this though.. :(


DB-Fiddle: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/qZLyGdyv2spYe3ZokZhYAP/1




What I have tried so far:



SELECT
DISTINCT
CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/', ritmValFromDt)
AS outputCol
FROM mytable;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20170407 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |


SELECT
DISTINCT
CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
CASE
WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN parmVldFromDt
ELSE ritmValFromDt
END)
AS outputCol
FROM mytable;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20170407 |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20190107 |



NOTE



  1. Please be as vendor neutral as possible when using SQL. This is not in my hands. I am not querying from source, so my hands are tied. Some vendor specific functions may be available, but this is not a guarantee.


  2. In the db-fiddle, MySQL (and the version used) is for illustration purpose only. As stated previously, I am not querying from an RDBMS, I am querying from a grid, so I have to adjust with what is available and how it is available in the grid.










share|improve this question
























  • imho the simplest solution to this would be to first create a query that produces the answers/evaluations to all the conditions (1., 2., 3., 4.1 and 4.2) for every prdntVrsnNum-wrkCtrCd combination via GROUP BY - let's say it's query Q. then you create the outputCol depending on the values calculated in Q (join Q) by creating with the case statement - which you already may master. There might be some vendor specific black magic that might make it possible without the join of the aggregate ... but you wanted it to be vendor unspecific ;o)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 9:38












  • @Jakumi I don't know how to write a case statement according to number of rows returned. That's one of the parts where I am stuck.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 9:44











  • @Jakumi you can give a vendor specific black magic if you want, I can check in my environment if it is available/enabled. :)

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 9:47











  • @Jakumi I have posted an answer. Please have a look.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 10:42

















1















This is the table I have



| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


Desired Result:



TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210
TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101
LI-LIN2/V001/66850/20180101


Requirements/Conditions:



Having prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd as key columns,



  1. Delete duplicates according to rtgTypeCd, rtgGrpCd, rtgNodeNum, parmVldFromDt, charVal


  2. If no records found, do nothing.


  3. If one record found, take ritmValFromDt for concatenation



  4. If multiple records found, see how many records have parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt



    4.1. If one record found, then use ritmValFromDt for concatenation.



    4.2. If multiple records found, then use parmVldFromDt for concatenation.




Intermediate result which I am using for explanation:



SELECT distinct * from mytable;

| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


From the above table, now I should reduce it to the following final table, which I will use for concatenation.



| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


EDIT: Further explanation:




  • V001|96228|TO-HCH2 comes under condition 4.2.


  • V003|197774|TOU-A16 comes under condition 4.1.


  • V001|66850|LI-LIN2 I think this condition comes by choosing ritmValFromDt since that's the greater one and we don't have any record for this combination having parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt But I'm not certain about this though.. :(


DB-Fiddle: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/qZLyGdyv2spYe3ZokZhYAP/1




What I have tried so far:



SELECT
DISTINCT
CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/', ritmValFromDt)
AS outputCol
FROM mytable;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20170407 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |


SELECT
DISTINCT
CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
CASE
WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN parmVldFromDt
ELSE ritmValFromDt
END)
AS outputCol
FROM mytable;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20170407 |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20190107 |



NOTE



  1. Please be as vendor neutral as possible when using SQL. This is not in my hands. I am not querying from source, so my hands are tied. Some vendor specific functions may be available, but this is not a guarantee.


  2. In the db-fiddle, MySQL (and the version used) is for illustration purpose only. As stated previously, I am not querying from an RDBMS, I am querying from a grid, so I have to adjust with what is available and how it is available in the grid.










share|improve this question
























  • imho the simplest solution to this would be to first create a query that produces the answers/evaluations to all the conditions (1., 2., 3., 4.1 and 4.2) for every prdntVrsnNum-wrkCtrCd combination via GROUP BY - let's say it's query Q. then you create the outputCol depending on the values calculated in Q (join Q) by creating with the case statement - which you already may master. There might be some vendor specific black magic that might make it possible without the join of the aggregate ... but you wanted it to be vendor unspecific ;o)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 9:38












  • @Jakumi I don't know how to write a case statement according to number of rows returned. That's one of the parts where I am stuck.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 9:44











  • @Jakumi you can give a vendor specific black magic if you want, I can check in my environment if it is available/enabled. :)

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 9:47











  • @Jakumi I have posted an answer. Please have a look.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 10:42













1












1








1








This is the table I have



| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


Desired Result:



TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210
TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101
LI-LIN2/V001/66850/20180101


Requirements/Conditions:



Having prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd as key columns,



  1. Delete duplicates according to rtgTypeCd, rtgGrpCd, rtgNodeNum, parmVldFromDt, charVal


  2. If no records found, do nothing.


  3. If one record found, take ritmValFromDt for concatenation



  4. If multiple records found, see how many records have parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt



    4.1. If one record found, then use ritmValFromDt for concatenation.



    4.2. If multiple records found, then use parmVldFromDt for concatenation.




Intermediate result which I am using for explanation:



SELECT distinct * from mytable;

| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


From the above table, now I should reduce it to the following final table, which I will use for concatenation.



| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


EDIT: Further explanation:




  • V001|96228|TO-HCH2 comes under condition 4.2.


  • V003|197774|TOU-A16 comes under condition 4.1.


  • V001|66850|LI-LIN2 I think this condition comes by choosing ritmValFromDt since that's the greater one and we don't have any record for this combination having parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt But I'm not certain about this though.. :(


DB-Fiddle: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/qZLyGdyv2spYe3ZokZhYAP/1




What I have tried so far:



SELECT
DISTINCT
CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/', ritmValFromDt)
AS outputCol
FROM mytable;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20170407 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |


SELECT
DISTINCT
CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
CASE
WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN parmVldFromDt
ELSE ritmValFromDt
END)
AS outputCol
FROM mytable;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20170407 |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20190107 |



NOTE



  1. Please be as vendor neutral as possible when using SQL. This is not in my hands. I am not querying from source, so my hands are tied. Some vendor specific functions may be available, but this is not a guarantee.


  2. In the db-fiddle, MySQL (and the version used) is for illustration purpose only. As stated previously, I am not querying from an RDBMS, I am querying from a grid, so I have to adjust with what is available and how it is available in the grid.










share|improve this question
















This is the table I have



| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


Desired Result:



TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210
TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101
LI-LIN2/V001/66850/20180101


Requirements/Conditions:



Having prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd as key columns,



  1. Delete duplicates according to rtgTypeCd, rtgGrpCd, rtgNodeNum, parmVldFromDt, charVal


  2. If no records found, do nothing.


  3. If one record found, take ritmValFromDt for concatenation



  4. If multiple records found, see how many records have parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt



    4.1. If one record found, then use ritmValFromDt for concatenation.



    4.2. If multiple records found, then use parmVldFromDt for concatenation.




Intermediate result which I am using for explanation:



SELECT distinct * from mytable;

| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20170407 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


From the above table, now I should reduce it to the following final table, which I will use for concatenation.



| prdntVrsnNum | matlNum | wrkCtrCd | ritmValFromDt | versnValFromDt | parmVldFromDt | rtgTypeCd | rtgGrpCd | rtgNodeNum | charVal |
| ------------ | ------- | -------- | ------------- | -------------- | ------------- | --------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- |
| V001 | 96228 | TO-HCH2 | 20170407 | 20170407 | 20180101 | N | 50020937 | 1 | 7 |
| V003 | 197774 | TOU-A16 | 20181210 | 20181207 | 20190107 | N | 50018492 | 6 | 1 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20141211 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 5 |
| V001 | 66850 | LI-LIN2 | 20180101 | 20141211 | 20151227 | N | 50018966 | 1 | 4.5 |


EDIT: Further explanation:




  • V001|96228|TO-HCH2 comes under condition 4.2.


  • V003|197774|TOU-A16 comes under condition 4.1.


  • V001|66850|LI-LIN2 I think this condition comes by choosing ritmValFromDt since that's the greater one and we don't have any record for this combination having parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt But I'm not certain about this though.. :(


DB-Fiddle: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/qZLyGdyv2spYe3ZokZhYAP/1




What I have tried so far:



SELECT
DISTINCT
CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/', ritmValFromDt)
AS outputCol
FROM mytable;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20170407 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |


SELECT
DISTINCT
CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
CASE
WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN parmVldFromDt
ELSE ritmValFromDt
END)
AS outputCol
FROM mytable;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20170407 |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20190107 |



NOTE



  1. Please be as vendor neutral as possible when using SQL. This is not in my hands. I am not querying from source, so my hands are tied. Some vendor specific functions may be available, but this is not a guarantee.


  2. In the db-fiddle, MySQL (and the version used) is for illustration purpose only. As stated previously, I am not querying from an RDBMS, I am querying from a grid, so I have to adjust with what is available and how it is available in the grid.







sql






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 26 at 17:50







scientific_explorer

















asked Mar 26 at 9:01









scientific_explorerscientific_explorer

1792 silver badges13 bronze badges




1792 silver badges13 bronze badges












  • imho the simplest solution to this would be to first create a query that produces the answers/evaluations to all the conditions (1., 2., 3., 4.1 and 4.2) for every prdntVrsnNum-wrkCtrCd combination via GROUP BY - let's say it's query Q. then you create the outputCol depending on the values calculated in Q (join Q) by creating with the case statement - which you already may master. There might be some vendor specific black magic that might make it possible without the join of the aggregate ... but you wanted it to be vendor unspecific ;o)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 9:38












  • @Jakumi I don't know how to write a case statement according to number of rows returned. That's one of the parts where I am stuck.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 9:44











  • @Jakumi you can give a vendor specific black magic if you want, I can check in my environment if it is available/enabled. :)

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 9:47











  • @Jakumi I have posted an answer. Please have a look.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 10:42

















  • imho the simplest solution to this would be to first create a query that produces the answers/evaluations to all the conditions (1., 2., 3., 4.1 and 4.2) for every prdntVrsnNum-wrkCtrCd combination via GROUP BY - let's say it's query Q. then you create the outputCol depending on the values calculated in Q (join Q) by creating with the case statement - which you already may master. There might be some vendor specific black magic that might make it possible without the join of the aggregate ... but you wanted it to be vendor unspecific ;o)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 9:38












  • @Jakumi I don't know how to write a case statement according to number of rows returned. That's one of the parts where I am stuck.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 9:44











  • @Jakumi you can give a vendor specific black magic if you want, I can check in my environment if it is available/enabled. :)

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 9:47











  • @Jakumi I have posted an answer. Please have a look.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 10:42
















imho the simplest solution to this would be to first create a query that produces the answers/evaluations to all the conditions (1., 2., 3., 4.1 and 4.2) for every prdntVrsnNum-wrkCtrCd combination via GROUP BY - let's say it's query Q. then you create the outputCol depending on the values calculated in Q (join Q) by creating with the case statement - which you already may master. There might be some vendor specific black magic that might make it possible without the join of the aggregate ... but you wanted it to be vendor unspecific ;o)

– Jakumi
Mar 26 at 9:38






imho the simplest solution to this would be to first create a query that produces the answers/evaluations to all the conditions (1., 2., 3., 4.1 and 4.2) for every prdntVrsnNum-wrkCtrCd combination via GROUP BY - let's say it's query Q. then you create the outputCol depending on the values calculated in Q (join Q) by creating with the case statement - which you already may master. There might be some vendor specific black magic that might make it possible without the join of the aggregate ... but you wanted it to be vendor unspecific ;o)

– Jakumi
Mar 26 at 9:38














@Jakumi I don't know how to write a case statement according to number of rows returned. That's one of the parts where I am stuck.

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 9:44





@Jakumi I don't know how to write a case statement according to number of rows returned. That's one of the parts where I am stuck.

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 9:44













@Jakumi you can give a vendor specific black magic if you want, I can check in my environment if it is available/enabled. :)

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 9:47





@Jakumi you can give a vendor specific black magic if you want, I can check in my environment if it is available/enabled. :)

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 9:47













@Jakumi I have posted an answer. Please have a look.

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 10:42





@Jakumi I have posted an answer. Please have a look.

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 10:42












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














I don't think you have defined your conditions correctly. In particular, you for the last condition, you seem to want the latest date.



I would go for window functions for this. I think the logic is:



SELECT CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
(CASE WHEN cnt = 1 OR cnt_gt = 1
THEN ritmValFromDt
ELSE parmVldFromDt
END)
) AS outputCol,
ritmValFromDt,parmVldFromDt
FROM (SELECT t.*,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt,
SUM(gt_flag) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt_gt,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, gt_flag ORDER BY parmVldFromDt DESC) as seqnum
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, ritmValFromDt, versnValFromDt, parmVldFromDt,
(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as gt_flag
FROM mytable
) t
) t
WHERE (cnt_gt > 0 AND parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt AND seqnum = 1) OR
(cnt_gt = 0);


Here is a db<>fiddle.






share|improve this answer























  • Conditions have been given to me by the functional team. I have asked them to come up with better explanations, but nothing so far. Not in my hands :(

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:07











  • @scientific_explorer . . . The last conditions suggests that you want multiple rows for a given combination. However, you seem to only want the latest.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Mar 26 at 11:36











  • I agree with you.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:41











  • Accepting your answer because it gives a very close result compared to my actual data. If you would like me to provide you with the data where it fails, please let me know, so that you can modify your query accordingly.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 15:00











  • I have added a few more rows of data, for which your query fails to give desired output. Please have a look

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 17:51


















0














I came up with an answer I tried on the fiddle. Not sure if it will work in my actual system (have to test it out now). I am not sure if this is the best/only way to achieve it either.



select
distinct
concat(distinctTable.wrkCtrCd, '/',
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum, '/',
distinctTable.matlNum, '/',
case when countTable.cnt = 1 then min(distinctTable.ritmValFromDt)
else max(distinctTable.parmVldFromDt)
end
) as outputCol
from
(
select
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd,
count(*) as cnt
from
(select distinct * from mytable) as tbl
group by
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd
) as countTable
inner join (select distinct * from mytable) as distinctTable
on countTable.prdntVrsnNum = distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum
and countTable.matlNum = distinctTable.matlNum
and countTable.wrkCtrCd = distinctTable.wrkCtrCd
group by
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum,
distinctTable.matlNum,
distinctTable.wrkCtrCd;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |





share|improve this answer























  • your 4th condition (comparing the count of rows where a certain condition is met or not met) can probably be prepared with SUM(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0) as cnt_whatever and in your select you can use that information. However, this is very similar to Gordon's gt_flag, but won't work anymore in his query, but might work in yours (needs an additional group by somewhere in that sub-subquery)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 15:12














Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55353213%2fhow-to-select-columns-based-on-count-of-number-of-records-returned%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














I don't think you have defined your conditions correctly. In particular, you for the last condition, you seem to want the latest date.



I would go for window functions for this. I think the logic is:



SELECT CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
(CASE WHEN cnt = 1 OR cnt_gt = 1
THEN ritmValFromDt
ELSE parmVldFromDt
END)
) AS outputCol,
ritmValFromDt,parmVldFromDt
FROM (SELECT t.*,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt,
SUM(gt_flag) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt_gt,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, gt_flag ORDER BY parmVldFromDt DESC) as seqnum
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, ritmValFromDt, versnValFromDt, parmVldFromDt,
(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as gt_flag
FROM mytable
) t
) t
WHERE (cnt_gt > 0 AND parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt AND seqnum = 1) OR
(cnt_gt = 0);


Here is a db<>fiddle.






share|improve this answer























  • Conditions have been given to me by the functional team. I have asked them to come up with better explanations, but nothing so far. Not in my hands :(

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:07











  • @scientific_explorer . . . The last conditions suggests that you want multiple rows for a given combination. However, you seem to only want the latest.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Mar 26 at 11:36











  • I agree with you.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:41











  • Accepting your answer because it gives a very close result compared to my actual data. If you would like me to provide you with the data where it fails, please let me know, so that you can modify your query accordingly.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 15:00











  • I have added a few more rows of data, for which your query fails to give desired output. Please have a look

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 17:51















1














I don't think you have defined your conditions correctly. In particular, you for the last condition, you seem to want the latest date.



I would go for window functions for this. I think the logic is:



SELECT CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
(CASE WHEN cnt = 1 OR cnt_gt = 1
THEN ritmValFromDt
ELSE parmVldFromDt
END)
) AS outputCol,
ritmValFromDt,parmVldFromDt
FROM (SELECT t.*,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt,
SUM(gt_flag) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt_gt,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, gt_flag ORDER BY parmVldFromDt DESC) as seqnum
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, ritmValFromDt, versnValFromDt, parmVldFromDt,
(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as gt_flag
FROM mytable
) t
) t
WHERE (cnt_gt > 0 AND parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt AND seqnum = 1) OR
(cnt_gt = 0);


Here is a db<>fiddle.






share|improve this answer























  • Conditions have been given to me by the functional team. I have asked them to come up with better explanations, but nothing so far. Not in my hands :(

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:07











  • @scientific_explorer . . . The last conditions suggests that you want multiple rows for a given combination. However, you seem to only want the latest.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Mar 26 at 11:36











  • I agree with you.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:41











  • Accepting your answer because it gives a very close result compared to my actual data. If you would like me to provide you with the data where it fails, please let me know, so that you can modify your query accordingly.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 15:00











  • I have added a few more rows of data, for which your query fails to give desired output. Please have a look

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 17:51













1












1








1







I don't think you have defined your conditions correctly. In particular, you for the last condition, you seem to want the latest date.



I would go for window functions for this. I think the logic is:



SELECT CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
(CASE WHEN cnt = 1 OR cnt_gt = 1
THEN ritmValFromDt
ELSE parmVldFromDt
END)
) AS outputCol,
ritmValFromDt,parmVldFromDt
FROM (SELECT t.*,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt,
SUM(gt_flag) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt_gt,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, gt_flag ORDER BY parmVldFromDt DESC) as seqnum
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, ritmValFromDt, versnValFromDt, parmVldFromDt,
(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as gt_flag
FROM mytable
) t
) t
WHERE (cnt_gt > 0 AND parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt AND seqnum = 1) OR
(cnt_gt = 0);


Here is a db<>fiddle.






share|improve this answer













I don't think you have defined your conditions correctly. In particular, you for the last condition, you seem to want the latest date.



I would go for window functions for this. I think the logic is:



SELECT CONCAT(wrkCtrCd, '/', prdntVrsnNum , '/', matlNum , '/',
(CASE WHEN cnt = 1 OR cnt_gt = 1
THEN ritmValFromDt
ELSE parmVldFromDt
END)
) AS outputCol,
ritmValFromDt,parmVldFromDt
FROM (SELECT t.*,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt,
SUM(gt_flag) OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd) as cnt_gt,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, gt_flag ORDER BY parmVldFromDt DESC) as seqnum
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT prdntVrsnNum, matlNum, wrkCtrCd, ritmValFromDt, versnValFromDt, parmVldFromDt,
(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as gt_flag
FROM mytable
) t
) t
WHERE (cnt_gt > 0 AND parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt AND seqnum = 1) OR
(cnt_gt = 0);


Here is a db<>fiddle.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 26 at 11:02









Gordon LinoffGordon Linoff

834k38 gold badges341 silver badges448 bronze badges




834k38 gold badges341 silver badges448 bronze badges












  • Conditions have been given to me by the functional team. I have asked them to come up with better explanations, but nothing so far. Not in my hands :(

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:07











  • @scientific_explorer . . . The last conditions suggests that you want multiple rows for a given combination. However, you seem to only want the latest.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Mar 26 at 11:36











  • I agree with you.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:41











  • Accepting your answer because it gives a very close result compared to my actual data. If you would like me to provide you with the data where it fails, please let me know, so that you can modify your query accordingly.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 15:00











  • I have added a few more rows of data, for which your query fails to give desired output. Please have a look

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 17:51

















  • Conditions have been given to me by the functional team. I have asked them to come up with better explanations, but nothing so far. Not in my hands :(

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:07











  • @scientific_explorer . . . The last conditions suggests that you want multiple rows for a given combination. However, you seem to only want the latest.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Mar 26 at 11:36











  • I agree with you.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 11:41











  • Accepting your answer because it gives a very close result compared to my actual data. If you would like me to provide you with the data where it fails, please let me know, so that you can modify your query accordingly.

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 15:00











  • I have added a few more rows of data, for which your query fails to give desired output. Please have a look

    – scientific_explorer
    Mar 26 at 17:51
















Conditions have been given to me by the functional team. I have asked them to come up with better explanations, but nothing so far. Not in my hands :(

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 11:07





Conditions have been given to me by the functional team. I have asked them to come up with better explanations, but nothing so far. Not in my hands :(

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 11:07













@scientific_explorer . . . The last conditions suggests that you want multiple rows for a given combination. However, you seem to only want the latest.

– Gordon Linoff
Mar 26 at 11:36





@scientific_explorer . . . The last conditions suggests that you want multiple rows for a given combination. However, you seem to only want the latest.

– Gordon Linoff
Mar 26 at 11:36













I agree with you.

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 11:41





I agree with you.

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 11:41













Accepting your answer because it gives a very close result compared to my actual data. If you would like me to provide you with the data where it fails, please let me know, so that you can modify your query accordingly.

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 15:00





Accepting your answer because it gives a very close result compared to my actual data. If you would like me to provide you with the data where it fails, please let me know, so that you can modify your query accordingly.

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 15:00













I have added a few more rows of data, for which your query fails to give desired output. Please have a look

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 17:51





I have added a few more rows of data, for which your query fails to give desired output. Please have a look

– scientific_explorer
Mar 26 at 17:51













0














I came up with an answer I tried on the fiddle. Not sure if it will work in my actual system (have to test it out now). I am not sure if this is the best/only way to achieve it either.



select
distinct
concat(distinctTable.wrkCtrCd, '/',
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum, '/',
distinctTable.matlNum, '/',
case when countTable.cnt = 1 then min(distinctTable.ritmValFromDt)
else max(distinctTable.parmVldFromDt)
end
) as outputCol
from
(
select
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd,
count(*) as cnt
from
(select distinct * from mytable) as tbl
group by
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd
) as countTable
inner join (select distinct * from mytable) as distinctTable
on countTable.prdntVrsnNum = distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum
and countTable.matlNum = distinctTable.matlNum
and countTable.wrkCtrCd = distinctTable.wrkCtrCd
group by
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum,
distinctTable.matlNum,
distinctTable.wrkCtrCd;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |





share|improve this answer























  • your 4th condition (comparing the count of rows where a certain condition is met or not met) can probably be prepared with SUM(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0) as cnt_whatever and in your select you can use that information. However, this is very similar to Gordon's gt_flag, but won't work anymore in his query, but might work in yours (needs an additional group by somewhere in that sub-subquery)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 15:12
















0














I came up with an answer I tried on the fiddle. Not sure if it will work in my actual system (have to test it out now). I am not sure if this is the best/only way to achieve it either.



select
distinct
concat(distinctTable.wrkCtrCd, '/',
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum, '/',
distinctTable.matlNum, '/',
case when countTable.cnt = 1 then min(distinctTable.ritmValFromDt)
else max(distinctTable.parmVldFromDt)
end
) as outputCol
from
(
select
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd,
count(*) as cnt
from
(select distinct * from mytable) as tbl
group by
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd
) as countTable
inner join (select distinct * from mytable) as distinctTable
on countTable.prdntVrsnNum = distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum
and countTable.matlNum = distinctTable.matlNum
and countTable.wrkCtrCd = distinctTable.wrkCtrCd
group by
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum,
distinctTable.matlNum,
distinctTable.wrkCtrCd;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |





share|improve this answer























  • your 4th condition (comparing the count of rows where a certain condition is met or not met) can probably be prepared with SUM(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0) as cnt_whatever and in your select you can use that information. However, this is very similar to Gordon's gt_flag, but won't work anymore in his query, but might work in yours (needs an additional group by somewhere in that sub-subquery)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 15:12














0












0








0







I came up with an answer I tried on the fiddle. Not sure if it will work in my actual system (have to test it out now). I am not sure if this is the best/only way to achieve it either.



select
distinct
concat(distinctTable.wrkCtrCd, '/',
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum, '/',
distinctTable.matlNum, '/',
case when countTable.cnt = 1 then min(distinctTable.ritmValFromDt)
else max(distinctTable.parmVldFromDt)
end
) as outputCol
from
(
select
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd,
count(*) as cnt
from
(select distinct * from mytable) as tbl
group by
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd
) as countTable
inner join (select distinct * from mytable) as distinctTable
on countTable.prdntVrsnNum = distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum
and countTable.matlNum = distinctTable.matlNum
and countTable.wrkCtrCd = distinctTable.wrkCtrCd
group by
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum,
distinctTable.matlNum,
distinctTable.wrkCtrCd;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |





share|improve this answer













I came up with an answer I tried on the fiddle. Not sure if it will work in my actual system (have to test it out now). I am not sure if this is the best/only way to achieve it either.



select
distinct
concat(distinctTable.wrkCtrCd, '/',
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum, '/',
distinctTable.matlNum, '/',
case when countTable.cnt = 1 then min(distinctTable.ritmValFromDt)
else max(distinctTable.parmVldFromDt)
end
) as outputCol
from
(
select
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd,
count(*) as cnt
from
(select distinct * from mytable) as tbl
group by
tbl.prdntVrsnNum,
tbl.matlNum,
tbl.wrkCtrCd
) as countTable
inner join (select distinct * from mytable) as distinctTable
on countTable.prdntVrsnNum = distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum
and countTable.matlNum = distinctTable.matlNum
and countTable.wrkCtrCd = distinctTable.wrkCtrCd
group by
distinctTable.prdntVrsnNum,
distinctTable.matlNum,
distinctTable.wrkCtrCd;

| outputCol |
| ---------------------------- |
| TO-HCH2/V001/96228/20180101 |
| TOU-A16/V003/197774/20181210 |






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 26 at 10:42









scientific_explorerscientific_explorer

1792 silver badges13 bronze badges




1792 silver badges13 bronze badges












  • your 4th condition (comparing the count of rows where a certain condition is met or not met) can probably be prepared with SUM(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0) as cnt_whatever and in your select you can use that information. However, this is very similar to Gordon's gt_flag, but won't work anymore in his query, but might work in yours (needs an additional group by somewhere in that sub-subquery)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 15:12


















  • your 4th condition (comparing the count of rows where a certain condition is met or not met) can probably be prepared with SUM(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0) as cnt_whatever and in your select you can use that information. However, this is very similar to Gordon's gt_flag, but won't work anymore in his query, but might work in yours (needs an additional group by somewhere in that sub-subquery)

    – Jakumi
    Mar 26 at 15:12

















your 4th condition (comparing the count of rows where a certain condition is met or not met) can probably be prepared with SUM(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0) as cnt_whatever and in your select you can use that information. However, this is very similar to Gordon's gt_flag, but won't work anymore in his query, but might work in yours (needs an additional group by somewhere in that sub-subquery)

– Jakumi
Mar 26 at 15:12






your 4th condition (comparing the count of rows where a certain condition is met or not met) can probably be prepared with SUM(CASE WHEN parmVldFromDt >= ritmValFromDt THEN 1 ELSE 0) as cnt_whatever and in your select you can use that information. However, this is very similar to Gordon's gt_flag, but won't work anymore in his query, but might work in yours (needs an additional group by somewhere in that sub-subquery)

– Jakumi
Mar 26 at 15:12


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55353213%2fhow-to-select-columns-based-on-count-of-number-of-records-returned%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현