Optimize Elastic Search queryElasticsearch get a selection of predefined types as result in one querymapping social relation elasticsearchElasticsearch 5.0.2 failed to search for keywordElasticsearch: The full-text search does not workelasticsearch 5.2 sorting with ICU plugin needs fielddata = true?How to get “related documents” in a query in Elasticearch?Elasticsearch Auto complete using ngramHow to aggregate on elasticsearch field of type string which includes a slash (/)Elasticsearch synonyms giving no resultsElastic Search Aggregation Query of multiple levels optimization

Short Story: Cold War setting. In orbit, two astronauts decide whether to launch nuclear counter strike ("MAD" scenario). Twist at end

Why don't modern jet engines use forced exhaust mixing?

Trying to understand how Digital Certificates and CA are indeed secure

Vegetarian dishes on Russian trains (European part)

Why do we use low resistance cables to minimize power losses?

What should I do with the stock I own if I anticipate there will be a recession?

Parse a simple key=value config file in C

Did Michelle Obama have a staff of 23; and Melania have a staff of 4?

Do I need to start off my book by describing the character's "normal world"?

Reducing contention in thread-safe LruCache

How to render "have ideas above his station" into German

Can anybody tell me who this Pokemon is?

How to train a replacement without them knowing?

Quick destruction of a helium filled airship?

Adjective or adverb before another adjective

How to prevent criminal gangs from making/buying guns?

Are there any OR challenges that are similar to kaggle's competitions?

How could Tony Stark wield the Infinity Nano Gauntlet - at all?

Expressing a chain of boolean ORs using ILP

What is the opposite of "hunger level"?

How do I answer an interview question about how to handle a hard deadline I won't be able to meet?

Why can't I see 1861 / 1871 census entries on Freecen website when I can see them on Ancestry website?

Photoshop older default brushes

What's a good pattern to calculate a variable only when it is used the first time?



Optimize Elastic Search query


Elasticsearch get a selection of predefined types as result in one querymapping social relation elasticsearchElasticsearch 5.0.2 failed to search for keywordElasticsearch: The full-text search does not workelasticsearch 5.2 sorting with ICU plugin needs fielddata = true?How to get “related documents” in a query in Elasticearch?Elasticsearch Auto complete using ngramHow to aggregate on elasticsearch field of type string which includes a slash (/)Elasticsearch synonyms giving no resultsElastic Search Aggregation Query of multiple levels optimization






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















I have recently added elasticsearch as search engine for a project, it's an ecommerce structure model, and i use it to load categories, manufacturers etc.



The queries typically run very fast around 200ms which is pretty good considering the number products i have as on some projects i have more than 1 milion products.



However in some cases, like on a simple category page where i have around 550k products in that category page, the query takes around 500ms, i am wondering if i can optimize it to be faster.



Please not that i have aggregations and more filters added in the query depending on the options the customer selects, but for optimizing purposes i have removed them as i have the same loading speed with or without them.



This is the query which in that particular case takes around 500-600 ms



 Array
(
[size] => 48
[from] => 0
[sort] => Array
(
[date_upd] => Array
(
[order] => desc
)

)

[query] => Array
(
[bool] => Array
(
[filter] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[term] => Array
(
[id_product_categories] => 38231
)

)

)

)

)

)


The elasticsearch index structure is as follows:
$data = array(



 'settings' =>

array(
'number_of_shards' => 1,
'number_of_replicas' => 0,
'analysis' => $analysis,
'index' => array(
'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'),
'sort.order' => array('desc','desc','desc','desc')
)
),

'mappings' => array(
'product' => array(
//'type' => 'product',
'_all' => array( 'enabled' => false),
'properties' => array
(
'id_product' => array(
'type' => 'integer'),

'id_image' =>array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),

'id_supplier' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'id_manufacturer' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'id_color' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'rating' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
),

'id_default_category' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),



'popularity' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),

'reduction_percent' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true
),

'is_reduced' => array(
'type' => 'boolean'
),

'reference' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,

),

'image_cover' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'image_title' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'product_link_title' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'price' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true
),

'old_price' => array(
'type' => 'float',
'null_value' => 0
),

'id_product_categories' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'date_add' => array(
'type' => 'date',
'format' => 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss',
'index' => true
),

'date_upd' => array(
'type' => 'date',
'format' => 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss'
),

'product_name' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_heading' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
"index" => false
),
/*
'product_description' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
*/
'product_color' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_categories' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_manufacturer' => array(
'type' => 'text',

),

'product_supplier' => array(
'type' => 'text'
),

'product_link' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false

)


)
)
)
);









share|improve this question
























  • Are you sure that is a query execution time, but not data fetching time? If your query returns 550K items that could just take long time to pass all data. Try to limit results to confirm if that is the case

    – Alex
    Mar 27 at 13:09











  • @Alex I am certain that is not the fetching time, it only returns 48 elements, i have size => 48 at the beginning of the query, see the example above. There are 550k total products in the query (total hits)

    – Pepelea Razvan Ionut
    Mar 27 at 13:40












  • Anyone can help with this?

    – Pepelea Razvan Ionut
    Mar 28 at 18:45











  • I don't have Elastic sever to test at the moment. But just a guess, extend your settings => 'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'), with id_product_categories

    – Alex
    Mar 28 at 19:05












  • If this is your actual query (I don't see the aggregation part). A term query should be really fast -- but you're wrapping it inside a filter so ES will cache it. Normally having a cache is really good, but if it's trying to fit in your most expensive query ... maybe not. You can check if it's still 500ms if you just run query: term: [id_product_categories] : value : "38231"

    – Tessmore
    Mar 28 at 23:45

















0















I have recently added elasticsearch as search engine for a project, it's an ecommerce structure model, and i use it to load categories, manufacturers etc.



The queries typically run very fast around 200ms which is pretty good considering the number products i have as on some projects i have more than 1 milion products.



However in some cases, like on a simple category page where i have around 550k products in that category page, the query takes around 500ms, i am wondering if i can optimize it to be faster.



Please not that i have aggregations and more filters added in the query depending on the options the customer selects, but for optimizing purposes i have removed them as i have the same loading speed with or without them.



This is the query which in that particular case takes around 500-600 ms



 Array
(
[size] => 48
[from] => 0
[sort] => Array
(
[date_upd] => Array
(
[order] => desc
)

)

[query] => Array
(
[bool] => Array
(
[filter] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[term] => Array
(
[id_product_categories] => 38231
)

)

)

)

)

)


The elasticsearch index structure is as follows:
$data = array(



 'settings' =>

array(
'number_of_shards' => 1,
'number_of_replicas' => 0,
'analysis' => $analysis,
'index' => array(
'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'),
'sort.order' => array('desc','desc','desc','desc')
)
),

'mappings' => array(
'product' => array(
//'type' => 'product',
'_all' => array( 'enabled' => false),
'properties' => array
(
'id_product' => array(
'type' => 'integer'),

'id_image' =>array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),

'id_supplier' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'id_manufacturer' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'id_color' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'rating' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
),

'id_default_category' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),



'popularity' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),

'reduction_percent' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true
),

'is_reduced' => array(
'type' => 'boolean'
),

'reference' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,

),

'image_cover' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'image_title' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'product_link_title' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'price' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true
),

'old_price' => array(
'type' => 'float',
'null_value' => 0
),

'id_product_categories' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'date_add' => array(
'type' => 'date',
'format' => 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss',
'index' => true
),

'date_upd' => array(
'type' => 'date',
'format' => 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss'
),

'product_name' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_heading' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
"index" => false
),
/*
'product_description' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
*/
'product_color' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_categories' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_manufacturer' => array(
'type' => 'text',

),

'product_supplier' => array(
'type' => 'text'
),

'product_link' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false

)


)
)
)
);









share|improve this question
























  • Are you sure that is a query execution time, but not data fetching time? If your query returns 550K items that could just take long time to pass all data. Try to limit results to confirm if that is the case

    – Alex
    Mar 27 at 13:09











  • @Alex I am certain that is not the fetching time, it only returns 48 elements, i have size => 48 at the beginning of the query, see the example above. There are 550k total products in the query (total hits)

    – Pepelea Razvan Ionut
    Mar 27 at 13:40












  • Anyone can help with this?

    – Pepelea Razvan Ionut
    Mar 28 at 18:45











  • I don't have Elastic sever to test at the moment. But just a guess, extend your settings => 'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'), with id_product_categories

    – Alex
    Mar 28 at 19:05












  • If this is your actual query (I don't see the aggregation part). A term query should be really fast -- but you're wrapping it inside a filter so ES will cache it. Normally having a cache is really good, but if it's trying to fit in your most expensive query ... maybe not. You can check if it's still 500ms if you just run query: term: [id_product_categories] : value : "38231"

    – Tessmore
    Mar 28 at 23:45













0












0








0


2






I have recently added elasticsearch as search engine for a project, it's an ecommerce structure model, and i use it to load categories, manufacturers etc.



The queries typically run very fast around 200ms which is pretty good considering the number products i have as on some projects i have more than 1 milion products.



However in some cases, like on a simple category page where i have around 550k products in that category page, the query takes around 500ms, i am wondering if i can optimize it to be faster.



Please not that i have aggregations and more filters added in the query depending on the options the customer selects, but for optimizing purposes i have removed them as i have the same loading speed with or without them.



This is the query which in that particular case takes around 500-600 ms



 Array
(
[size] => 48
[from] => 0
[sort] => Array
(
[date_upd] => Array
(
[order] => desc
)

)

[query] => Array
(
[bool] => Array
(
[filter] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[term] => Array
(
[id_product_categories] => 38231
)

)

)

)

)

)


The elasticsearch index structure is as follows:
$data = array(



 'settings' =>

array(
'number_of_shards' => 1,
'number_of_replicas' => 0,
'analysis' => $analysis,
'index' => array(
'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'),
'sort.order' => array('desc','desc','desc','desc')
)
),

'mappings' => array(
'product' => array(
//'type' => 'product',
'_all' => array( 'enabled' => false),
'properties' => array
(
'id_product' => array(
'type' => 'integer'),

'id_image' =>array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),

'id_supplier' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'id_manufacturer' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'id_color' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'rating' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
),

'id_default_category' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),



'popularity' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),

'reduction_percent' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true
),

'is_reduced' => array(
'type' => 'boolean'
),

'reference' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,

),

'image_cover' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'image_title' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'product_link_title' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'price' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true
),

'old_price' => array(
'type' => 'float',
'null_value' => 0
),

'id_product_categories' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'date_add' => array(
'type' => 'date',
'format' => 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss',
'index' => true
),

'date_upd' => array(
'type' => 'date',
'format' => 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss'
),

'product_name' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_heading' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
"index" => false
),
/*
'product_description' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
*/
'product_color' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_categories' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_manufacturer' => array(
'type' => 'text',

),

'product_supplier' => array(
'type' => 'text'
),

'product_link' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false

)


)
)
)
);









share|improve this question














I have recently added elasticsearch as search engine for a project, it's an ecommerce structure model, and i use it to load categories, manufacturers etc.



The queries typically run very fast around 200ms which is pretty good considering the number products i have as on some projects i have more than 1 milion products.



However in some cases, like on a simple category page where i have around 550k products in that category page, the query takes around 500ms, i am wondering if i can optimize it to be faster.



Please not that i have aggregations and more filters added in the query depending on the options the customer selects, but for optimizing purposes i have removed them as i have the same loading speed with or without them.



This is the query which in that particular case takes around 500-600 ms



 Array
(
[size] => 48
[from] => 0
[sort] => Array
(
[date_upd] => Array
(
[order] => desc
)

)

[query] => Array
(
[bool] => Array
(
[filter] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[term] => Array
(
[id_product_categories] => 38231
)

)

)

)

)

)


The elasticsearch index structure is as follows:
$data = array(



 'settings' =>

array(
'number_of_shards' => 1,
'number_of_replicas' => 0,
'analysis' => $analysis,
'index' => array(
'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'),
'sort.order' => array('desc','desc','desc','desc')
)
),

'mappings' => array(
'product' => array(
//'type' => 'product',
'_all' => array( 'enabled' => false),
'properties' => array
(
'id_product' => array(
'type' => 'integer'),

'id_image' =>array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),

'id_supplier' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'id_manufacturer' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'id_color' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'rating' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
),

'id_default_category' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),



'popularity' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0
),

'reduction_percent' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true
),

'is_reduced' => array(
'type' => 'boolean'
),

'reference' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,

),

'image_cover' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'image_title' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'product_link_title' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false,
),

'price' => array(
'type' => 'integer',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true
),

'old_price' => array(
'type' => 'float',
'null_value' => 0
),

'id_product_categories' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'null_value' => 0,
'index' => true,
'eager_global_ordinals' => true
),

'date_add' => array(
'type' => 'date',
'format' => 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss',
'index' => true
),

'date_upd' => array(
'type' => 'date',
'format' => 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss'
),

'product_name' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_heading' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
"index" => false
),
/*
'product_description' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
*/
'product_color' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_categories' => array(
'type' => 'text',
"analyzer" => $lang_iso_code .'_analyzer'
),
'product_manufacturer' => array(
'type' => 'text',

),

'product_supplier' => array(
'type' => 'text'
),

'product_link' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'index' => false

)


)
)
)
);






elasticsearch elasticsearch-aggregation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 27 at 12:56









Pepelea Razvan IonutPepelea Razvan Ionut

307 bronze badges




307 bronze badges















  • Are you sure that is a query execution time, but not data fetching time? If your query returns 550K items that could just take long time to pass all data. Try to limit results to confirm if that is the case

    – Alex
    Mar 27 at 13:09











  • @Alex I am certain that is not the fetching time, it only returns 48 elements, i have size => 48 at the beginning of the query, see the example above. There are 550k total products in the query (total hits)

    – Pepelea Razvan Ionut
    Mar 27 at 13:40












  • Anyone can help with this?

    – Pepelea Razvan Ionut
    Mar 28 at 18:45











  • I don't have Elastic sever to test at the moment. But just a guess, extend your settings => 'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'), with id_product_categories

    – Alex
    Mar 28 at 19:05












  • If this is your actual query (I don't see the aggregation part). A term query should be really fast -- but you're wrapping it inside a filter so ES will cache it. Normally having a cache is really good, but if it's trying to fit in your most expensive query ... maybe not. You can check if it's still 500ms if you just run query: term: [id_product_categories] : value : "38231"

    – Tessmore
    Mar 28 at 23:45

















  • Are you sure that is a query execution time, but not data fetching time? If your query returns 550K items that could just take long time to pass all data. Try to limit results to confirm if that is the case

    – Alex
    Mar 27 at 13:09











  • @Alex I am certain that is not the fetching time, it only returns 48 elements, i have size => 48 at the beginning of the query, see the example above. There are 550k total products in the query (total hits)

    – Pepelea Razvan Ionut
    Mar 27 at 13:40












  • Anyone can help with this?

    – Pepelea Razvan Ionut
    Mar 28 at 18:45











  • I don't have Elastic sever to test at the moment. But just a guess, extend your settings => 'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'), with id_product_categories

    – Alex
    Mar 28 at 19:05












  • If this is your actual query (I don't see the aggregation part). A term query should be really fast -- but you're wrapping it inside a filter so ES will cache it. Normally having a cache is really good, but if it's trying to fit in your most expensive query ... maybe not. You can check if it's still 500ms if you just run query: term: [id_product_categories] : value : "38231"

    – Tessmore
    Mar 28 at 23:45
















Are you sure that is a query execution time, but not data fetching time? If your query returns 550K items that could just take long time to pass all data. Try to limit results to confirm if that is the case

– Alex
Mar 27 at 13:09





Are you sure that is a query execution time, but not data fetching time? If your query returns 550K items that could just take long time to pass all data. Try to limit results to confirm if that is the case

– Alex
Mar 27 at 13:09













@Alex I am certain that is not the fetching time, it only returns 48 elements, i have size => 48 at the beginning of the query, see the example above. There are 550k total products in the query (total hits)

– Pepelea Razvan Ionut
Mar 27 at 13:40






@Alex I am certain that is not the fetching time, it only returns 48 elements, i have size => 48 at the beginning of the query, see the example above. There are 550k total products in the query (total hits)

– Pepelea Razvan Ionut
Mar 27 at 13:40














Anyone can help with this?

– Pepelea Razvan Ionut
Mar 28 at 18:45





Anyone can help with this?

– Pepelea Razvan Ionut
Mar 28 at 18:45













I don't have Elastic sever to test at the moment. But just a guess, extend your settings => 'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'), with id_product_categories

– Alex
Mar 28 at 19:05






I don't have Elastic sever to test at the moment. But just a guess, extend your settings => 'sort.field' => array('date_add','date_upd', 'reduction_percent','price'), with id_product_categories

– Alex
Mar 28 at 19:05














If this is your actual query (I don't see the aggregation part). A term query should be really fast -- but you're wrapping it inside a filter so ES will cache it. Normally having a cache is really good, but if it's trying to fit in your most expensive query ... maybe not. You can check if it's still 500ms if you just run query: term: [id_product_categories] : value : "38231"

– Tessmore
Mar 28 at 23:45





If this is your actual query (I don't see the aggregation part). A term query should be really fast -- but you're wrapping it inside a filter so ES will cache it. Normally having a cache is really good, but if it's trying to fit in your most expensive query ... maybe not. You can check if it's still 500ms if you just run query: term: [id_product_categories] : value : "38231"

– Tessmore
Mar 28 at 23:45












0






active

oldest

votes










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55377755%2foptimize-elastic-search-query%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes




Is this question similar to what you get asked at work? Learn more about asking and sharing private information with your coworkers using Stack Overflow for Teams.







Is this question similar to what you get asked at work? Learn more about asking and sharing private information with your coworkers using Stack Overflow for Teams.



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55377755%2foptimize-elastic-search-query%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

용인 삼성생명 블루밍스 목차 통계 역대 감독 선수단 응원단 경기장 같이 보기 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴samsungblueminx.comeh선수 명단용인 삼성생명 블루밍스용인 삼성생명 블루밍스ehsamsungblueminx.comeheheheh

155 수학 과학 기타 둘러보기 메뉴eh추가해eh문서를 완성해