Getting Http Response from boto3 table.batch_writer objectPython: replacing a function within a class of a moduleWhat does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do?Why do people use Heroku when AWS is present? What distinguishes Heroku from AWS?How to save S3 object to a file using boto3Open S3 object as a string with Boto3What is the difference between the AWS boto and boto3Boto3, python and how to handle errorsBoto3: get credentials dynamically?Complete scan of dynamoDb with boto3Getting Dict response - Boto3Get largest value of primary key from DynamoDB table using boto3Unable to delete item from DynamoDB StringSet with boto3

Has anyone in space seen or photographed a simple laser pointer from Earth?

Why would non-kinetic weapons be used for orbital bombardment?

Optimization terminology: "Exact" v. "Approximate"

How were Martello towers supposed to work?

Which star / galaxy is moving away from us the fastest?

Is there a strong legal guarantee that the U.S. can give to another country that it won't attack them?

Single word for "refusing to move to next activity unless present one is completed."

What's the point of having a RAID 1 configuration over incremental backups to a secondary drive?

What were the main German words for a prostitute before 1800?

What is a "shilicashe?"

Indesign - how to change the style of the page numbers?

Why did Harry Potter get a bedroom?

What does the phrase "head down the rat's hole" mean here?

How to befriend private nested class

LED glows slightly during soldering

How can I get a player to accept that they should stop trying to pull stunts without thinking them through first?

Integer Lists of Noah

Why isn't pressure filtration popular compared to vacuum filtration?

Is there any reason why MCU changed the Snap to Blip

Fast validation of time windows in a routing problem

How do you move up one folder in Finder?

If your plane is out-of-control, why does military training instruct releasing the joystick to neutralize controls?

This one's for Matthew:

Is it possible to create a craft with specific bones, like the bones of a forgotten beast?



Getting Http Response from boto3 table.batch_writer object


Python: replacing a function within a class of a moduleWhat does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do?Why do people use Heroku when AWS is present? What distinguishes Heroku from AWS?How to save S3 object to a file using boto3Open S3 object as a string with Boto3What is the difference between the AWS boto and boto3Boto3, python and how to handle errorsBoto3: get credentials dynamically?Complete scan of dynamoDb with boto3Getting Dict response - Boto3Get largest value of primary key from DynamoDB table using boto3Unable to delete item from DynamoDB StringSet with boto3






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















There is a list of data in a csv that I want to put into a dynamodb table on aws. See sample list below.



 Mary,F,7065
Anna,F,2604
Emma,F,2003
Elizabeth,F,1939
Minnie,F,1746
Margaret,F,1578
Ida,F,1472
Alice,F,1414
Bertha,F,1320
Sarah,F,1288
Annie,F,1258
Clara,F,1226
Ella,F,1156
Florence,F,1063
Cora,F,1045
Martha,F,1040
Laura,F,1012
Nellie,F,995
Grace,F,982
Carrie,F,949
Maude,F,858
Mabel,F,808
Bessie,F,796
Jennie,F,793
Gertrude,F,787
Julia,F,783
Hattie,F,769
Edith,F,768
Mattie,F,704
Rose,F,700
Catherine,F,688
Lillian,F,672
Ada,F,652
Lillie,F,647
Helen,F,636
Jessie,F,635
Louise,F,635
Ethel,F,633
Lula,F,621
Myrtle,F,615
Eva,F,614
Frances,F,605
Lena,F,603
Lucy,F,590
Edna,F,588
Maggie,F,582
Pearl,F,569
Daisy,F,564
Fannie,F,560
Josephine,F,544


In order to write more than 25 items to a dynamodb table, the documents use a batch_writer object.



 resource = boto3.resource('dynamodb')
table = resource.Table('Names')
with table.batch_writer() as batch:
for item in items:
batch.put_item(item)


Is there a way to return an http response to indicate a successful completion of the batch_write? I know that it is asyncronous. Is there a wait or fetch or something to call?










share|improve this question




























    2















    There is a list of data in a csv that I want to put into a dynamodb table on aws. See sample list below.



     Mary,F,7065
    Anna,F,2604
    Emma,F,2003
    Elizabeth,F,1939
    Minnie,F,1746
    Margaret,F,1578
    Ida,F,1472
    Alice,F,1414
    Bertha,F,1320
    Sarah,F,1288
    Annie,F,1258
    Clara,F,1226
    Ella,F,1156
    Florence,F,1063
    Cora,F,1045
    Martha,F,1040
    Laura,F,1012
    Nellie,F,995
    Grace,F,982
    Carrie,F,949
    Maude,F,858
    Mabel,F,808
    Bessie,F,796
    Jennie,F,793
    Gertrude,F,787
    Julia,F,783
    Hattie,F,769
    Edith,F,768
    Mattie,F,704
    Rose,F,700
    Catherine,F,688
    Lillian,F,672
    Ada,F,652
    Lillie,F,647
    Helen,F,636
    Jessie,F,635
    Louise,F,635
    Ethel,F,633
    Lula,F,621
    Myrtle,F,615
    Eva,F,614
    Frances,F,605
    Lena,F,603
    Lucy,F,590
    Edna,F,588
    Maggie,F,582
    Pearl,F,569
    Daisy,F,564
    Fannie,F,560
    Josephine,F,544


    In order to write more than 25 items to a dynamodb table, the documents use a batch_writer object.



     resource = boto3.resource('dynamodb')
    table = resource.Table('Names')
    with table.batch_writer() as batch:
    for item in items:
    batch.put_item(item)


    Is there a way to return an http response to indicate a successful completion of the batch_write? I know that it is asyncronous. Is there a wait or fetch or something to call?










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2


      2






      There is a list of data in a csv that I want to put into a dynamodb table on aws. See sample list below.



       Mary,F,7065
      Anna,F,2604
      Emma,F,2003
      Elizabeth,F,1939
      Minnie,F,1746
      Margaret,F,1578
      Ida,F,1472
      Alice,F,1414
      Bertha,F,1320
      Sarah,F,1288
      Annie,F,1258
      Clara,F,1226
      Ella,F,1156
      Florence,F,1063
      Cora,F,1045
      Martha,F,1040
      Laura,F,1012
      Nellie,F,995
      Grace,F,982
      Carrie,F,949
      Maude,F,858
      Mabel,F,808
      Bessie,F,796
      Jennie,F,793
      Gertrude,F,787
      Julia,F,783
      Hattie,F,769
      Edith,F,768
      Mattie,F,704
      Rose,F,700
      Catherine,F,688
      Lillian,F,672
      Ada,F,652
      Lillie,F,647
      Helen,F,636
      Jessie,F,635
      Louise,F,635
      Ethel,F,633
      Lula,F,621
      Myrtle,F,615
      Eva,F,614
      Frances,F,605
      Lena,F,603
      Lucy,F,590
      Edna,F,588
      Maggie,F,582
      Pearl,F,569
      Daisy,F,564
      Fannie,F,560
      Josephine,F,544


      In order to write more than 25 items to a dynamodb table, the documents use a batch_writer object.



       resource = boto3.resource('dynamodb')
      table = resource.Table('Names')
      with table.batch_writer() as batch:
      for item in items:
      batch.put_item(item)


      Is there a way to return an http response to indicate a successful completion of the batch_write? I know that it is asyncronous. Is there a wait or fetch or something to call?










      share|improve this question














      There is a list of data in a csv that I want to put into a dynamodb table on aws. See sample list below.



       Mary,F,7065
      Anna,F,2604
      Emma,F,2003
      Elizabeth,F,1939
      Minnie,F,1746
      Margaret,F,1578
      Ida,F,1472
      Alice,F,1414
      Bertha,F,1320
      Sarah,F,1288
      Annie,F,1258
      Clara,F,1226
      Ella,F,1156
      Florence,F,1063
      Cora,F,1045
      Martha,F,1040
      Laura,F,1012
      Nellie,F,995
      Grace,F,982
      Carrie,F,949
      Maude,F,858
      Mabel,F,808
      Bessie,F,796
      Jennie,F,793
      Gertrude,F,787
      Julia,F,783
      Hattie,F,769
      Edith,F,768
      Mattie,F,704
      Rose,F,700
      Catherine,F,688
      Lillian,F,672
      Ada,F,652
      Lillie,F,647
      Helen,F,636
      Jessie,F,635
      Louise,F,635
      Ethel,F,633
      Lula,F,621
      Myrtle,F,615
      Eva,F,614
      Frances,F,605
      Lena,F,603
      Lucy,F,590
      Edna,F,588
      Maggie,F,582
      Pearl,F,569
      Daisy,F,564
      Fannie,F,560
      Josephine,F,544


      In order to write more than 25 items to a dynamodb table, the documents use a batch_writer object.



       resource = boto3.resource('dynamodb')
      table = resource.Table('Names')
      with table.batch_writer() as batch:
      for item in items:
      batch.put_item(item)


      Is there a way to return an http response to indicate a successful completion of the batch_write? I know that it is asyncronous. Is there a wait or fetch or something to call?







      python-3.x amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb boto3






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 21 at 17:50









      polkapolka

      7271 gold badge14 silver badges28 bronze badges




      7271 gold badge14 silver badges28 bronze badges






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          The documents for the BatchWriter object instantiated by batch_writer are located (<3 Open Source) here. Looking at the BatchWriter class, the _flush method generates a response, it just doesn't store it anywhere.



          class BatchWriter(object):
          """Automatically handle batch writes to DynamoDB for a single table."""
          def __init__(self, table_name, client, flush_amount=25,
          overwrite_by_pkeys=None):
          """
          :type table_name: str
          :param table_name: The name of the table. The class handles
          batch writes to a single table.
          :type client: ``botocore.client.Client``
          :param client: A botocore client. Note this client
          **must** have the dynamodb customizations applied
          to it for transforming AttributeValues into the
          wire protocol. What this means in practice is that
          you need to use a client that comes from a DynamoDB
          resource if you're going to instantiate this class
          directly, i.e
          ``boto3.resource('dynamodb').Table('foo').meta.client``.
          :type flush_amount: int
          :param flush_amount: The number of items to keep in
          a local buffer before sending a batch_write_item
          request to DynamoDB.
          :type overwrite_by_pkeys: list(string)
          :param overwrite_by_pkeys: De-duplicate request items in buffer
          if match new request item on specified primary keys. i.e
          ``["partition_key1", "sort_key2", "sort_key3"]``
          """
          self._table_name = table_name
          self._client = client
          self._items_buffer = []
          self._flush_amount = flush_amount
          self._overwrite_by_pkeys = overwrite_by_pkeys

          def put_item(self, Item):
          self._add_request_and_process('PutRequest': 'Item': Item)

          def delete_item(self, Key):
          self._add_request_and_process('DeleteRequest': 'Key': Key)

          def _add_request_and_process(self, request):
          if self._overwrite_by_pkeys:
          self._remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(request)
          self._items_buffer.append(request)
          self._flush_if_needed()

          def _remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(self, request):
          pkey_values_new = self._extract_pkey_values(request)
          for item in self._items_buffer:
          if self._extract_pkey_values(item) == pkey_values_new:
          self._items_buffer.remove(item)
          logger.debug("With overwrite_by_pkeys enabled, skipping "
          "request:%s", item)

          def _extract_pkey_values(self, request):
          if request.get('PutRequest'):
          return [request['PutRequest']['Item'][key]
          for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
          elif request.get('DeleteRequest'):
          return [request['DeleteRequest']['Key'][key]
          for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
          return None

          def _flush_if_needed(self):
          if len(self._items_buffer) >= self._flush_amount:
          self._flush()

          def _flush(self):
          items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
          self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
          response = self._client.batch_write_item(
          RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
          unprocessed_items = response['UnprocessedItems']

          if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
          # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
          # next batch we send.
          self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
          else:
          self._items_buffer = []
          logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
          len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))

          def __enter__(self):
          return self

          def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, tb):
          # When we exit, we need to keep flushing whatever's left
          # until there's nothing left in our items buffer.
          while self._items_buffer:
          self._flush()


          How I solved it:



          I built on the responses to this question about overwriting class methods. They all work, but the best for my use case was to overwrite the class instance with this version of _flush.



          First I built a new version of _flush.



          import logging
          import types

          ## New Flush

          def _flush(self):
          items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
          self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
          self._response = self._client.batch_write_item(
          RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
          unprocessed_items = self._response['UnprocessedItems']

          if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
          # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
          # next batch we send.
          self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
          else:
          self._items_buffer = []
          logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
          len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))




          Then I overwrote the instance method like this.



          with batch_writer() as batch:
          batch._flush=types.MethodType(_flush, batch)
          for item in items:
          batch.put_item(Item=item)
          print(batch._response)


          And this generates an output like this.



          'UnprocessedItems': ,
          'ResponseMetadata': 'RequestId': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
          'HTTPStatusCode': 200,
          'HTTPHeaders': 'server': 'Server',
          'date': 'Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:29:49 GMT',
          'content-type': 'application/x-amz-json-1.0',
          'content-length': '23',
          'connection': 'keep-alive',
          'x-amzn-requestid': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
          'x-amz-crc32': '4185382645',
          'RetryAttempts': 0





          share|improve this answer






























            0





            +50









            There doesn't appear to be any built-in way to do this. The _flush method on BatchWriter does log a debug message when it finishes a batch, though. If you just want to see what's happening, you could enable debug logging before your put_item loop:



            import logging
            logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
            logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)


            If you want to take some action instead you could create a custom logging.Handler, something like this:



            import logging
            import sys

            class CatchBatchWrites(logging.Handler):
            def handle(self, record):
            if record.msg.startswith('Batch write sent'):
            processed, unprocessed = record.args
            # do something with these numbers


            logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
            logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG) # still necessary
            logger.addHandler(CatchBatchWrites())





            share|improve this answer

























            • Let me know if this has to be a separate question, but what does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do? It has an http response, but I don't know what it is referring to or whether it is relevant to the above situation.

              – polka
              Mar 26 at 18:24












            • I don't think it's relevant, but I'm not sure what it does! Yes - I would suggest making that a separate question if you do want to know more.

              – Nathan Vērzemnieks
              Mar 27 at 4:42












            • Ok. Made a new question here, @nathan-vērzemnieks

              – polka
              Mar 27 at 5:08











            • I am trying to implement your solution, and I am getting this valueerror. ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 0)

              – polka
              Mar 27 at 5:26












            • Running the logging is supplying a record.msg of Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s.

              – polka
              Mar 27 at 5:45













            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55286446%2fgetting-http-response-from-boto3-table-batch-writer-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            The documents for the BatchWriter object instantiated by batch_writer are located (<3 Open Source) here. Looking at the BatchWriter class, the _flush method generates a response, it just doesn't store it anywhere.



            class BatchWriter(object):
            """Automatically handle batch writes to DynamoDB for a single table."""
            def __init__(self, table_name, client, flush_amount=25,
            overwrite_by_pkeys=None):
            """
            :type table_name: str
            :param table_name: The name of the table. The class handles
            batch writes to a single table.
            :type client: ``botocore.client.Client``
            :param client: A botocore client. Note this client
            **must** have the dynamodb customizations applied
            to it for transforming AttributeValues into the
            wire protocol. What this means in practice is that
            you need to use a client that comes from a DynamoDB
            resource if you're going to instantiate this class
            directly, i.e
            ``boto3.resource('dynamodb').Table('foo').meta.client``.
            :type flush_amount: int
            :param flush_amount: The number of items to keep in
            a local buffer before sending a batch_write_item
            request to DynamoDB.
            :type overwrite_by_pkeys: list(string)
            :param overwrite_by_pkeys: De-duplicate request items in buffer
            if match new request item on specified primary keys. i.e
            ``["partition_key1", "sort_key2", "sort_key3"]``
            """
            self._table_name = table_name
            self._client = client
            self._items_buffer = []
            self._flush_amount = flush_amount
            self._overwrite_by_pkeys = overwrite_by_pkeys

            def put_item(self, Item):
            self._add_request_and_process('PutRequest': 'Item': Item)

            def delete_item(self, Key):
            self._add_request_and_process('DeleteRequest': 'Key': Key)

            def _add_request_and_process(self, request):
            if self._overwrite_by_pkeys:
            self._remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(request)
            self._items_buffer.append(request)
            self._flush_if_needed()

            def _remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(self, request):
            pkey_values_new = self._extract_pkey_values(request)
            for item in self._items_buffer:
            if self._extract_pkey_values(item) == pkey_values_new:
            self._items_buffer.remove(item)
            logger.debug("With overwrite_by_pkeys enabled, skipping "
            "request:%s", item)

            def _extract_pkey_values(self, request):
            if request.get('PutRequest'):
            return [request['PutRequest']['Item'][key]
            for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
            elif request.get('DeleteRequest'):
            return [request['DeleteRequest']['Key'][key]
            for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
            return None

            def _flush_if_needed(self):
            if len(self._items_buffer) >= self._flush_amount:
            self._flush()

            def _flush(self):
            items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
            self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
            response = self._client.batch_write_item(
            RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
            unprocessed_items = response['UnprocessedItems']

            if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
            # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
            # next batch we send.
            self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
            else:
            self._items_buffer = []
            logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
            len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))

            def __enter__(self):
            return self

            def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, tb):
            # When we exit, we need to keep flushing whatever's left
            # until there's nothing left in our items buffer.
            while self._items_buffer:
            self._flush()


            How I solved it:



            I built on the responses to this question about overwriting class methods. They all work, but the best for my use case was to overwrite the class instance with this version of _flush.



            First I built a new version of _flush.



            import logging
            import types

            ## New Flush

            def _flush(self):
            items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
            self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
            self._response = self._client.batch_write_item(
            RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
            unprocessed_items = self._response['UnprocessedItems']

            if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
            # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
            # next batch we send.
            self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
            else:
            self._items_buffer = []
            logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
            len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))




            Then I overwrote the instance method like this.



            with batch_writer() as batch:
            batch._flush=types.MethodType(_flush, batch)
            for item in items:
            batch.put_item(Item=item)
            print(batch._response)


            And this generates an output like this.



            'UnprocessedItems': ,
            'ResponseMetadata': 'RequestId': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
            'HTTPStatusCode': 200,
            'HTTPHeaders': 'server': 'Server',
            'date': 'Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:29:49 GMT',
            'content-type': 'application/x-amz-json-1.0',
            'content-length': '23',
            'connection': 'keep-alive',
            'x-amzn-requestid': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
            'x-amz-crc32': '4185382645',
            'RetryAttempts': 0





            share|improve this answer



























              1














              The documents for the BatchWriter object instantiated by batch_writer are located (<3 Open Source) here. Looking at the BatchWriter class, the _flush method generates a response, it just doesn't store it anywhere.



              class BatchWriter(object):
              """Automatically handle batch writes to DynamoDB for a single table."""
              def __init__(self, table_name, client, flush_amount=25,
              overwrite_by_pkeys=None):
              """
              :type table_name: str
              :param table_name: The name of the table. The class handles
              batch writes to a single table.
              :type client: ``botocore.client.Client``
              :param client: A botocore client. Note this client
              **must** have the dynamodb customizations applied
              to it for transforming AttributeValues into the
              wire protocol. What this means in practice is that
              you need to use a client that comes from a DynamoDB
              resource if you're going to instantiate this class
              directly, i.e
              ``boto3.resource('dynamodb').Table('foo').meta.client``.
              :type flush_amount: int
              :param flush_amount: The number of items to keep in
              a local buffer before sending a batch_write_item
              request to DynamoDB.
              :type overwrite_by_pkeys: list(string)
              :param overwrite_by_pkeys: De-duplicate request items in buffer
              if match new request item on specified primary keys. i.e
              ``["partition_key1", "sort_key2", "sort_key3"]``
              """
              self._table_name = table_name
              self._client = client
              self._items_buffer = []
              self._flush_amount = flush_amount
              self._overwrite_by_pkeys = overwrite_by_pkeys

              def put_item(self, Item):
              self._add_request_and_process('PutRequest': 'Item': Item)

              def delete_item(self, Key):
              self._add_request_and_process('DeleteRequest': 'Key': Key)

              def _add_request_and_process(self, request):
              if self._overwrite_by_pkeys:
              self._remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(request)
              self._items_buffer.append(request)
              self._flush_if_needed()

              def _remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(self, request):
              pkey_values_new = self._extract_pkey_values(request)
              for item in self._items_buffer:
              if self._extract_pkey_values(item) == pkey_values_new:
              self._items_buffer.remove(item)
              logger.debug("With overwrite_by_pkeys enabled, skipping "
              "request:%s", item)

              def _extract_pkey_values(self, request):
              if request.get('PutRequest'):
              return [request['PutRequest']['Item'][key]
              for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
              elif request.get('DeleteRequest'):
              return [request['DeleteRequest']['Key'][key]
              for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
              return None

              def _flush_if_needed(self):
              if len(self._items_buffer) >= self._flush_amount:
              self._flush()

              def _flush(self):
              items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
              self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
              response = self._client.batch_write_item(
              RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
              unprocessed_items = response['UnprocessedItems']

              if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
              # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
              # next batch we send.
              self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
              else:
              self._items_buffer = []
              logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
              len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))

              def __enter__(self):
              return self

              def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, tb):
              # When we exit, we need to keep flushing whatever's left
              # until there's nothing left in our items buffer.
              while self._items_buffer:
              self._flush()


              How I solved it:



              I built on the responses to this question about overwriting class methods. They all work, but the best for my use case was to overwrite the class instance with this version of _flush.



              First I built a new version of _flush.



              import logging
              import types

              ## New Flush

              def _flush(self):
              items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
              self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
              self._response = self._client.batch_write_item(
              RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
              unprocessed_items = self._response['UnprocessedItems']

              if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
              # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
              # next batch we send.
              self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
              else:
              self._items_buffer = []
              logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
              len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))




              Then I overwrote the instance method like this.



              with batch_writer() as batch:
              batch._flush=types.MethodType(_flush, batch)
              for item in items:
              batch.put_item(Item=item)
              print(batch._response)


              And this generates an output like this.



              'UnprocessedItems': ,
              'ResponseMetadata': 'RequestId': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
              'HTTPStatusCode': 200,
              'HTTPHeaders': 'server': 'Server',
              'date': 'Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:29:49 GMT',
              'content-type': 'application/x-amz-json-1.0',
              'content-length': '23',
              'connection': 'keep-alive',
              'x-amzn-requestid': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
              'x-amz-crc32': '4185382645',
              'RetryAttempts': 0





              share|improve this answer

























                1












                1








                1







                The documents for the BatchWriter object instantiated by batch_writer are located (<3 Open Source) here. Looking at the BatchWriter class, the _flush method generates a response, it just doesn't store it anywhere.



                class BatchWriter(object):
                """Automatically handle batch writes to DynamoDB for a single table."""
                def __init__(self, table_name, client, flush_amount=25,
                overwrite_by_pkeys=None):
                """
                :type table_name: str
                :param table_name: The name of the table. The class handles
                batch writes to a single table.
                :type client: ``botocore.client.Client``
                :param client: A botocore client. Note this client
                **must** have the dynamodb customizations applied
                to it for transforming AttributeValues into the
                wire protocol. What this means in practice is that
                you need to use a client that comes from a DynamoDB
                resource if you're going to instantiate this class
                directly, i.e
                ``boto3.resource('dynamodb').Table('foo').meta.client``.
                :type flush_amount: int
                :param flush_amount: The number of items to keep in
                a local buffer before sending a batch_write_item
                request to DynamoDB.
                :type overwrite_by_pkeys: list(string)
                :param overwrite_by_pkeys: De-duplicate request items in buffer
                if match new request item on specified primary keys. i.e
                ``["partition_key1", "sort_key2", "sort_key3"]``
                """
                self._table_name = table_name
                self._client = client
                self._items_buffer = []
                self._flush_amount = flush_amount
                self._overwrite_by_pkeys = overwrite_by_pkeys

                def put_item(self, Item):
                self._add_request_and_process('PutRequest': 'Item': Item)

                def delete_item(self, Key):
                self._add_request_and_process('DeleteRequest': 'Key': Key)

                def _add_request_and_process(self, request):
                if self._overwrite_by_pkeys:
                self._remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(request)
                self._items_buffer.append(request)
                self._flush_if_needed()

                def _remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(self, request):
                pkey_values_new = self._extract_pkey_values(request)
                for item in self._items_buffer:
                if self._extract_pkey_values(item) == pkey_values_new:
                self._items_buffer.remove(item)
                logger.debug("With overwrite_by_pkeys enabled, skipping "
                "request:%s", item)

                def _extract_pkey_values(self, request):
                if request.get('PutRequest'):
                return [request['PutRequest']['Item'][key]
                for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
                elif request.get('DeleteRequest'):
                return [request['DeleteRequest']['Key'][key]
                for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
                return None

                def _flush_if_needed(self):
                if len(self._items_buffer) >= self._flush_amount:
                self._flush()

                def _flush(self):
                items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
                self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
                response = self._client.batch_write_item(
                RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
                unprocessed_items = response['UnprocessedItems']

                if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
                # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
                # next batch we send.
                self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
                else:
                self._items_buffer = []
                logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
                len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))

                def __enter__(self):
                return self

                def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, tb):
                # When we exit, we need to keep flushing whatever's left
                # until there's nothing left in our items buffer.
                while self._items_buffer:
                self._flush()


                How I solved it:



                I built on the responses to this question about overwriting class methods. They all work, but the best for my use case was to overwrite the class instance with this version of _flush.



                First I built a new version of _flush.



                import logging
                import types

                ## New Flush

                def _flush(self):
                items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
                self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
                self._response = self._client.batch_write_item(
                RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
                unprocessed_items = self._response['UnprocessedItems']

                if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
                # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
                # next batch we send.
                self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
                else:
                self._items_buffer = []
                logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
                len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))




                Then I overwrote the instance method like this.



                with batch_writer() as batch:
                batch._flush=types.MethodType(_flush, batch)
                for item in items:
                batch.put_item(Item=item)
                print(batch._response)


                And this generates an output like this.



                'UnprocessedItems': ,
                'ResponseMetadata': 'RequestId': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
                'HTTPStatusCode': 200,
                'HTTPHeaders': 'server': 'Server',
                'date': 'Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:29:49 GMT',
                'content-type': 'application/x-amz-json-1.0',
                'content-length': '23',
                'connection': 'keep-alive',
                'x-amzn-requestid': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
                'x-amz-crc32': '4185382645',
                'RetryAttempts': 0





                share|improve this answer













                The documents for the BatchWriter object instantiated by batch_writer are located (<3 Open Source) here. Looking at the BatchWriter class, the _flush method generates a response, it just doesn't store it anywhere.



                class BatchWriter(object):
                """Automatically handle batch writes to DynamoDB for a single table."""
                def __init__(self, table_name, client, flush_amount=25,
                overwrite_by_pkeys=None):
                """
                :type table_name: str
                :param table_name: The name of the table. The class handles
                batch writes to a single table.
                :type client: ``botocore.client.Client``
                :param client: A botocore client. Note this client
                **must** have the dynamodb customizations applied
                to it for transforming AttributeValues into the
                wire protocol. What this means in practice is that
                you need to use a client that comes from a DynamoDB
                resource if you're going to instantiate this class
                directly, i.e
                ``boto3.resource('dynamodb').Table('foo').meta.client``.
                :type flush_amount: int
                :param flush_amount: The number of items to keep in
                a local buffer before sending a batch_write_item
                request to DynamoDB.
                :type overwrite_by_pkeys: list(string)
                :param overwrite_by_pkeys: De-duplicate request items in buffer
                if match new request item on specified primary keys. i.e
                ``["partition_key1", "sort_key2", "sort_key3"]``
                """
                self._table_name = table_name
                self._client = client
                self._items_buffer = []
                self._flush_amount = flush_amount
                self._overwrite_by_pkeys = overwrite_by_pkeys

                def put_item(self, Item):
                self._add_request_and_process('PutRequest': 'Item': Item)

                def delete_item(self, Key):
                self._add_request_and_process('DeleteRequest': 'Key': Key)

                def _add_request_and_process(self, request):
                if self._overwrite_by_pkeys:
                self._remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(request)
                self._items_buffer.append(request)
                self._flush_if_needed()

                def _remove_dup_pkeys_request_if_any(self, request):
                pkey_values_new = self._extract_pkey_values(request)
                for item in self._items_buffer:
                if self._extract_pkey_values(item) == pkey_values_new:
                self._items_buffer.remove(item)
                logger.debug("With overwrite_by_pkeys enabled, skipping "
                "request:%s", item)

                def _extract_pkey_values(self, request):
                if request.get('PutRequest'):
                return [request['PutRequest']['Item'][key]
                for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
                elif request.get('DeleteRequest'):
                return [request['DeleteRequest']['Key'][key]
                for key in self._overwrite_by_pkeys]
                return None

                def _flush_if_needed(self):
                if len(self._items_buffer) >= self._flush_amount:
                self._flush()

                def _flush(self):
                items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
                self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
                response = self._client.batch_write_item(
                RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
                unprocessed_items = response['UnprocessedItems']

                if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
                # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
                # next batch we send.
                self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
                else:
                self._items_buffer = []
                logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
                len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))

                def __enter__(self):
                return self

                def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, tb):
                # When we exit, we need to keep flushing whatever's left
                # until there's nothing left in our items buffer.
                while self._items_buffer:
                self._flush()


                How I solved it:



                I built on the responses to this question about overwriting class methods. They all work, but the best for my use case was to overwrite the class instance with this version of _flush.



                First I built a new version of _flush.



                import logging
                import types

                ## New Flush

                def _flush(self):
                items_to_send = self._items_buffer[:self._flush_amount]
                self._items_buffer = self._items_buffer[self._flush_amount:]
                self._response = self._client.batch_write_item(
                RequestItems=self._table_name: items_to_send)
                unprocessed_items = self._response['UnprocessedItems']

                if unprocessed_items and unprocessed_items[self._table_name]:
                # Any unprocessed_items are immediately added to the
                # next batch we send.
                self._items_buffer.extend(unprocessed_items[self._table_name])
                else:
                self._items_buffer = []
                logger.debug("Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s",
                len(items_to_send), len(self._items_buffer))




                Then I overwrote the instance method like this.



                with batch_writer() as batch:
                batch._flush=types.MethodType(_flush, batch)
                for item in items:
                batch.put_item(Item=item)
                print(batch._response)


                And this generates an output like this.



                'UnprocessedItems': ,
                'ResponseMetadata': 'RequestId': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
                'HTTPStatusCode': 200,
                'HTTPHeaders': 'server': 'Server',
                'date': 'Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:29:49 GMT',
                'content-type': 'application/x-amz-json-1.0',
                'content-length': '23',
                'connection': 'keep-alive',
                'x-amzn-requestid': '853HSV0ULO4BN71R6T895J991VVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJ',
                'x-amz-crc32': '4185382645',
                'RetryAttempts': 0






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 29 at 19:28









                polkapolka

                7271 gold badge14 silver badges28 bronze badges




                7271 gold badge14 silver badges28 bronze badges























                    0





                    +50









                    There doesn't appear to be any built-in way to do this. The _flush method on BatchWriter does log a debug message when it finishes a batch, though. If you just want to see what's happening, you could enable debug logging before your put_item loop:



                    import logging
                    logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
                    logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)


                    If you want to take some action instead you could create a custom logging.Handler, something like this:



                    import logging
                    import sys

                    class CatchBatchWrites(logging.Handler):
                    def handle(self, record):
                    if record.msg.startswith('Batch write sent'):
                    processed, unprocessed = record.args
                    # do something with these numbers


                    logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
                    logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG) # still necessary
                    logger.addHandler(CatchBatchWrites())





                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Let me know if this has to be a separate question, but what does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do? It has an http response, but I don't know what it is referring to or whether it is relevant to the above situation.

                      – polka
                      Mar 26 at 18:24












                    • I don't think it's relevant, but I'm not sure what it does! Yes - I would suggest making that a separate question if you do want to know more.

                      – Nathan Vērzemnieks
                      Mar 27 at 4:42












                    • Ok. Made a new question here, @nathan-vērzemnieks

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:08











                    • I am trying to implement your solution, and I am getting this valueerror. ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 0)

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:26












                    • Running the logging is supplying a record.msg of Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s.

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:45















                    0





                    +50









                    There doesn't appear to be any built-in way to do this. The _flush method on BatchWriter does log a debug message when it finishes a batch, though. If you just want to see what's happening, you could enable debug logging before your put_item loop:



                    import logging
                    logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
                    logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)


                    If you want to take some action instead you could create a custom logging.Handler, something like this:



                    import logging
                    import sys

                    class CatchBatchWrites(logging.Handler):
                    def handle(self, record):
                    if record.msg.startswith('Batch write sent'):
                    processed, unprocessed = record.args
                    # do something with these numbers


                    logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
                    logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG) # still necessary
                    logger.addHandler(CatchBatchWrites())





                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Let me know if this has to be a separate question, but what does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do? It has an http response, but I don't know what it is referring to or whether it is relevant to the above situation.

                      – polka
                      Mar 26 at 18:24












                    • I don't think it's relevant, but I'm not sure what it does! Yes - I would suggest making that a separate question if you do want to know more.

                      – Nathan Vērzemnieks
                      Mar 27 at 4:42












                    • Ok. Made a new question here, @nathan-vērzemnieks

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:08











                    • I am trying to implement your solution, and I am getting this valueerror. ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 0)

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:26












                    • Running the logging is supplying a record.msg of Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s.

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:45













                    0





                    +50







                    0





                    +50



                    0




                    +50





                    There doesn't appear to be any built-in way to do this. The _flush method on BatchWriter does log a debug message when it finishes a batch, though. If you just want to see what's happening, you could enable debug logging before your put_item loop:



                    import logging
                    logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
                    logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)


                    If you want to take some action instead you could create a custom logging.Handler, something like this:



                    import logging
                    import sys

                    class CatchBatchWrites(logging.Handler):
                    def handle(self, record):
                    if record.msg.startswith('Batch write sent'):
                    processed, unprocessed = record.args
                    # do something with these numbers


                    logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
                    logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG) # still necessary
                    logger.addHandler(CatchBatchWrites())





                    share|improve this answer















                    There doesn't appear to be any built-in way to do this. The _flush method on BatchWriter does log a debug message when it finishes a batch, though. If you just want to see what's happening, you could enable debug logging before your put_item loop:



                    import logging
                    logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
                    logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)


                    If you want to take some action instead you could create a custom logging.Handler, something like this:



                    import logging
                    import sys

                    class CatchBatchWrites(logging.Handler):
                    def handle(self, record):
                    if record.msg.startswith('Batch write sent'):
                    processed, unprocessed = record.args
                    # do something with these numbers


                    logger = logging.getLogger('boto3.dynamodb.table')
                    logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG) # still necessary
                    logger.addHandler(CatchBatchWrites())






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Mar 27 at 19:13

























                    answered Mar 26 at 5:53









                    Nathan VērzemnieksNathan Vērzemnieks

                    4,6881 gold badge6 silver badges18 bronze badges




                    4,6881 gold badge6 silver badges18 bronze badges












                    • Let me know if this has to be a separate question, but what does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do? It has an http response, but I don't know what it is referring to or whether it is relevant to the above situation.

                      – polka
                      Mar 26 at 18:24












                    • I don't think it's relevant, but I'm not sure what it does! Yes - I would suggest making that a separate question if you do want to know more.

                      – Nathan Vērzemnieks
                      Mar 27 at 4:42












                    • Ok. Made a new question here, @nathan-vērzemnieks

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:08











                    • I am trying to implement your solution, and I am getting this valueerror. ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 0)

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:26












                    • Running the logging is supplying a record.msg of Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s.

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:45

















                    • Let me know if this has to be a separate question, but what does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do? It has an http response, but I don't know what it is referring to or whether it is relevant to the above situation.

                      – polka
                      Mar 26 at 18:24












                    • I don't think it's relevant, but I'm not sure what it does! Yes - I would suggest making that a separate question if you do want to know more.

                      – Nathan Vērzemnieks
                      Mar 27 at 4:42












                    • Ok. Made a new question here, @nathan-vērzemnieks

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:08











                    • I am trying to implement your solution, and I am getting this valueerror. ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 0)

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:26












                    • Running the logging is supplying a record.msg of Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s.

                      – polka
                      Mar 27 at 5:45
















                    Let me know if this has to be a separate question, but what does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do? It has an http response, but I don't know what it is referring to or whether it is relevant to the above situation.

                    – polka
                    Mar 26 at 18:24






                    Let me know if this has to be a separate question, but what does the batch._client.describe_endpoints function do? It has an http response, but I don't know what it is referring to or whether it is relevant to the above situation.

                    – polka
                    Mar 26 at 18:24














                    I don't think it's relevant, but I'm not sure what it does! Yes - I would suggest making that a separate question if you do want to know more.

                    – Nathan Vērzemnieks
                    Mar 27 at 4:42






                    I don't think it's relevant, but I'm not sure what it does! Yes - I would suggest making that a separate question if you do want to know more.

                    – Nathan Vērzemnieks
                    Mar 27 at 4:42














                    Ok. Made a new question here, @nathan-vērzemnieks

                    – polka
                    Mar 27 at 5:08





                    Ok. Made a new question here, @nathan-vērzemnieks

                    – polka
                    Mar 27 at 5:08













                    I am trying to implement your solution, and I am getting this valueerror. ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 0)

                    – polka
                    Mar 27 at 5:26






                    I am trying to implement your solution, and I am getting this valueerror. ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 0)

                    – polka
                    Mar 27 at 5:26














                    Running the logging is supplying a record.msg of Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s.

                    – polka
                    Mar 27 at 5:45





                    Running the logging is supplying a record.msg of Batch write sent %s, unprocessed: %s.

                    – polka
                    Mar 27 at 5:45

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55286446%2fgetting-http-response-from-boto3-table-batch-writer-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                    Swift 4 - func physicsWorld not invoked on collision? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to call Objective-C code from Swift#ifdef replacement in the Swift language@selector() in Swift?#pragma mark in Swift?Swift for loop: for index, element in array?dispatch_after - GCD in Swift?Swift Beta performance: sorting arraysSplit a String into an array in Swift?The use of Swift 3 @objc inference in Swift 4 mode is deprecated?How to optimize UITableViewCell, because my UITableView lags

                    Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript