Is it possible to use character codes instead of in javascript?How do JavaScript closures work?What is the most efficient way to deep clone an object in JavaScript?How do I remove a property from a JavaScript object?Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?How do I include a JavaScript file in another JavaScript file?What does “use strict” do in JavaScript, and what is the reasoning behind it?How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?For-each over an array in JavaScript?Is it possible to apply CSS to half of a character?
Was there a dinosaur-counter in the original Jurassic Park movie?
What is the thing used to help pouring liquids called?
When referring to a person only by their surname, should I keep or omit "von"?
What does the coin flipping before dying mean?
How to preserve a rare version of a book?
How do I, as a DM, handle a party that decides to set up an ambush in a dungeon?
Books of scary stories with two or three plots each
In "Avengers: Endgame", what does this name refer to?
Some questions about antistatic wrist strap
Which version of the Squat Nimbleness feat is correct?
Can an Iranian citizen enter the USA on a Dutch passport?
Summer '19 Sandbox error: String index out of range: 0: Source
Collision domain question
How to replace space with '+' symbol in a triangular array?
Has the United States ever had a non-Christian President?
Is crescere the correct word meaning to to grow or cultivate?
What do you call a painting painted on a wall?
Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?
How did the Apollo guidance computer handle parity bit errors?
How is trade in services conducted under the WTO in the absence of the Doha conclusion?
Is there precedent or are there procedures for a US president refusing to concede to an electoral defeat?
Can anyone identify this unknown 1988 PC card from The Palantir Corporation?
Endgame puzzle: How to avoid stalemate and win?
If an enemy monster charms one PC and tells them to attack a second PC, and then the second PC charms the monster, what happens?
Is it possible to use character codes instead of in javascript?
How do JavaScript closures work?What is the most efficient way to deep clone an object in JavaScript?How do I remove a property from a JavaScript object?Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?How do I include a JavaScript file in another JavaScript file?What does “use strict” do in JavaScript, and what is the reasoning behind it?How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?For-each over an array in JavaScript?Is it possible to apply CSS to half of a character?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I'm using a perl script that generates an indexed search file for my website. Part of the functionality is that it excludes anything between < and > characters to avoid indexing tag contents. This has always worked fine, until recently when I included some javascript on all my pages that contains < and > characters.
Before I investigate modifying a perl script that I currently find bamboozling, I'm wondering if it's possible to use character codes instead of < and > characters in my javascript?
The specific lines of code that need < and > characters omitted are:
let foo = bar.filter(ele => parseInt(ele)>0 && ele.length ==4);
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
javascript
asked Mar 23 at 4:57
Dr_HoonDr_Hoon
256
|
show 1 more comment
I'm using a perl script that generates an indexed search file for my website. Part of the functionality is that it excludes anything between < and > characters to avoid indexing tag contents. This has always worked fine, until recently when I included some javascript on all my pages that contains < and > characters.
Before I investigate modifying a perl script that I currently find bamboozling, I'm wondering if it's possible to use character codes instead of < and > characters in my javascript?
The specific lines of code that need < and > characters omitted are:
let foo = bar.filter(ele => parseInt(ele)>0 && ele.length ==4);
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
javascript
asked Mar 23 at 4:57
Dr_HoonDr_Hoon
256
4
You probably should just skip searching text in your<script>tags entirely.
– Patrick Roberts
Mar 23 at 5:00
No it is not possible to do what you're asking.
– Pointy
Mar 23 at 5:03
Maybe possible with eval, but eval <shudder>
– Jack Bashford
Mar 23 at 5:05
@Sanjayif (a < b)throws an error when parsed as JavaScript.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:47
1
This is an XY problem instead of changing all of your JS code, either fix your Perl script or simply load the JS from a separate file. The second one is probably the simplest possible solution that is most correct anyway. But the Perl code is likely to give you other trouble in the future that you probably don't anticipate right now.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:52
|
show 1 more comment
I'm using a perl script that generates an indexed search file for my website. Part of the functionality is that it excludes anything between < and > characters to avoid indexing tag contents. This has always worked fine, until recently when I included some javascript on all my pages that contains < and > characters.
Before I investigate modifying a perl script that I currently find bamboozling, I'm wondering if it's possible to use character codes instead of < and > characters in my javascript?
The specific lines of code that need < and > characters omitted are:
let foo = bar.filter(ele => parseInt(ele)>0 && ele.length ==4);
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
javascript
asked Mar 23 at 4:57
Dr_HoonDr_Hoon
256
I'm using a perl script that generates an indexed search file for my website. Part of the functionality is that it excludes anything between < and > characters to avoid indexing tag contents. This has always worked fine, until recently when I included some javascript on all my pages that contains < and > characters.
Before I investigate modifying a perl script that I currently find bamboozling, I'm wondering if it's possible to use character codes instead of < and > characters in my javascript?
The specific lines of code that need < and > characters omitted are:
let foo = bar.filter(ele => parseInt(ele)>0 && ele.length ==4);
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
javascript
javascript
asked Mar 23 at 4:57
Dr_HoonDr_Hoon
256
asked Mar 23 at 4:57
Dr_HoonDr_Hoon
256
asked Mar 23 at 4:57
Dr_HoonDr_Hoon
256
asked Mar 23 at 4:57
Dr_HoonDr_Hoon
256
asked Mar 23 at 4:57
Dr_HoonDr_Hoon
256
256
4
You probably should just skip searching text in your<script>tags entirely.
– Patrick Roberts
Mar 23 at 5:00
No it is not possible to do what you're asking.
– Pointy
Mar 23 at 5:03
Maybe possible with eval, but eval <shudder>
– Jack Bashford
Mar 23 at 5:05
@Sanjayif (a < b)throws an error when parsed as JavaScript.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:47
1
This is an XY problem instead of changing all of your JS code, either fix your Perl script or simply load the JS from a separate file. The second one is probably the simplest possible solution that is most correct anyway. But the Perl code is likely to give you other trouble in the future that you probably don't anticipate right now.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:52
|
show 1 more comment
4
You probably should just skip searching text in your<script>tags entirely.
– Patrick Roberts
Mar 23 at 5:00
No it is not possible to do what you're asking.
– Pointy
Mar 23 at 5:03
Maybe possible with eval, but eval <shudder>
– Jack Bashford
Mar 23 at 5:05
@Sanjayif (a < b)throws an error when parsed as JavaScript.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:47
1
This is an XY problem instead of changing all of your JS code, either fix your Perl script or simply load the JS from a separate file. The second one is probably the simplest possible solution that is most correct anyway. But the Perl code is likely to give you other trouble in the future that you probably don't anticipate right now.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:52
4
4
You probably should just skip searching text in your
<script> tags entirely.– Patrick Roberts
Mar 23 at 5:00
You probably should just skip searching text in your
<script> tags entirely.– Patrick Roberts
Mar 23 at 5:00
No it is not possible to do what you're asking.
– Pointy
Mar 23 at 5:03
No it is not possible to do what you're asking.
– Pointy
Mar 23 at 5:03
Maybe possible with eval, but eval <shudder>
– Jack Bashford
Mar 23 at 5:05
Maybe possible with eval, but eval <shudder>
– Jack Bashford
Mar 23 at 5:05
@Sanjay
if (a < b) throws an error when parsed as JavaScript.– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:47
@Sanjay
if (a < b) throws an error when parsed as JavaScript.– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:47
1
1
This is an XY problem instead of changing all of your JS code, either fix your Perl script or simply load the JS from a separate file. The second one is probably the simplest possible solution that is most correct anyway. But the Perl code is likely to give you other trouble in the future that you probably don't anticipate right now.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:52
This is an XY problem instead of changing all of your JS code, either fix your Perl script or simply load the JS from a separate file. The second one is probably the simplest possible solution that is most correct anyway. But the Perl code is likely to give you other trouble in the future that you probably don't anticipate right now.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:52
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Instead of
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
do this
var css = document.createElement('link');
css.href = morefoo+'morebar.css';
css.rel = 'stylesheet';
document.head.appendChild(css);
// or the last line for OLD browsers (i.e. IE)
document.getElementsByTagName('head'][0].appendChild(css);
answered Mar 23 at 5:15
Jaromanda XJaromanda X
36.9k43255
add a comment |
Here are some tips you can try:
- First Avoid arrow function, instead pass a anonymous function inside filter method and return the value explicitly.
- For the statement parseInt(ele)>0, use a function like isPositive(number). Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file.
- As @Jaromanda mentioned in previous answer how you can you load stylesheet dynamically.
These three steps will surely help you to meet your requirements.
answered Mar 23 at 5:37
santanu berasantanu bera
445312
"Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file" if doing that, why not just load all JavaScript separately to begin with, which means you wouldn't need to make a separateisPositivecode?
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:49
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55310747%2fis-it-possible-to-use-character-codes-instead-of-and-in-javascript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Instead of
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
do this
var css = document.createElement('link');
css.href = morefoo+'morebar.css';
css.rel = 'stylesheet';
document.head.appendChild(css);
// or the last line for OLD browsers (i.e. IE)
document.getElementsByTagName('head'][0].appendChild(css);
answered Mar 23 at 5:15
Jaromanda XJaromanda X
36.9k43255
add a comment |
Instead of
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
do this
var css = document.createElement('link');
css.href = morefoo+'morebar.css';
css.rel = 'stylesheet';
document.head.appendChild(css);
// or the last line for OLD browsers (i.e. IE)
document.getElementsByTagName('head'][0].appendChild(css);
answered Mar 23 at 5:15
Jaromanda XJaromanda X
36.9k43255
add a comment |
Instead of
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
do this
var css = document.createElement('link');
css.href = morefoo+'morebar.css';
css.rel = 'stylesheet';
document.head.appendChild(css);
// or the last line for OLD browsers (i.e. IE)
document.getElementsByTagName('head'][0].appendChild(css);
answered Mar 23 at 5:15
Jaromanda XJaromanda X
36.9k43255
Instead of
document.write('<link href="'+morefoo+'morebar.css"/>');
do this
var css = document.createElement('link');
css.href = morefoo+'morebar.css';
css.rel = 'stylesheet';
document.head.appendChild(css);
// or the last line for OLD browsers (i.e. IE)
document.getElementsByTagName('head'][0].appendChild(css);
answered Mar 23 at 5:15
Jaromanda XJaromanda X
36.9k43255
answered Mar 23 at 5:15
Jaromanda XJaromanda X
36.9k43255
answered Mar 23 at 5:15
Jaromanda XJaromanda X
36.9k43255
answered Mar 23 at 5:15
Jaromanda XJaromanda X
36.9k43255
36.9k43255
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here are some tips you can try:
- First Avoid arrow function, instead pass a anonymous function inside filter method and return the value explicitly.
- For the statement parseInt(ele)>0, use a function like isPositive(number). Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file.
- As @Jaromanda mentioned in previous answer how you can you load stylesheet dynamically.
These three steps will surely help you to meet your requirements.
answered Mar 23 at 5:37
santanu berasantanu bera
445312
"Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file" if doing that, why not just load all JavaScript separately to begin with, which means you wouldn't need to make a separateisPositivecode?
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:49
add a comment |
Here are some tips you can try:
- First Avoid arrow function, instead pass a anonymous function inside filter method and return the value explicitly.
- For the statement parseInt(ele)>0, use a function like isPositive(number). Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file.
- As @Jaromanda mentioned in previous answer how you can you load stylesheet dynamically.
These three steps will surely help you to meet your requirements.
answered Mar 23 at 5:37
santanu berasantanu bera
445312
"Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file" if doing that, why not just load all JavaScript separately to begin with, which means you wouldn't need to make a separateisPositivecode?
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:49
add a comment |
Here are some tips you can try:
- First Avoid arrow function, instead pass a anonymous function inside filter method and return the value explicitly.
- For the statement parseInt(ele)>0, use a function like isPositive(number). Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file.
- As @Jaromanda mentioned in previous answer how you can you load stylesheet dynamically.
These three steps will surely help you to meet your requirements.
answered Mar 23 at 5:37
santanu berasantanu bera
445312
Here are some tips you can try:
- First Avoid arrow function, instead pass a anonymous function inside filter method and return the value explicitly.
- For the statement parseInt(ele)>0, use a function like isPositive(number). Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file.
- As @Jaromanda mentioned in previous answer how you can you load stylesheet dynamically.
These three steps will surely help you to meet your requirements.
answered Mar 23 at 5:37
santanu berasantanu bera
445312
answered Mar 23 at 5:37
santanu berasantanu bera
445312
answered Mar 23 at 5:37
santanu berasantanu bera
445312
answered Mar 23 at 5:37
santanu berasantanu bera
445312
445312
"Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file" if doing that, why not just load all JavaScript separately to begin with, which means you wouldn't need to make a separateisPositivecode?
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:49
add a comment |
"Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file" if doing that, why not just load all JavaScript separately to begin with, which means you wouldn't need to make a separateisPositivecode?
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:49
"Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file" if doing that, why not just load all JavaScript separately to begin with, which means you wouldn't need to make a separate
isPositive code?– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:49
"Create this method and load that method seperately before executing your actual file" if doing that, why not just load all JavaScript separately to begin with, which means you wouldn't need to make a separate
isPositive code?– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:49
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55310747%2fis-it-possible-to-use-character-codes-instead-of-and-in-javascript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
You probably should just skip searching text in your
<script>tags entirely.– Patrick Roberts
Mar 23 at 5:00
No it is not possible to do what you're asking.
– Pointy
Mar 23 at 5:03
Maybe possible with eval, but eval <shudder>
– Jack Bashford
Mar 23 at 5:05
@Sanjay
if (a < b)throws an error when parsed as JavaScript.– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:47
1
This is an XY problem instead of changing all of your JS code, either fix your Perl script or simply load the JS from a separate file. The second one is probably the simplest possible solution that is most correct anyway. But the Perl code is likely to give you other trouble in the future that you probably don't anticipate right now.
– VLAZ
Mar 23 at 5:52