Should I wrap every prop with useCallback or useMemo, when to use this hooks?How to pass props to this.props.childrenReact props not correctly set when wrapping an inputHow to store props passed on Click of an event in ReactTrigger onChange when new props are receivedReact child component state not updating when new props are passedReact.js onclick event: Cannot read property 'props' of undefinedReact hooks useMemo/useCallback skipPerformance penalty of creating handlers on every render with react-hooksReact useState - setValue rerenders the component even though the value is the sameReact Hooks useCallback causes child to re-render

Picking a theme as a discovery writer

Can an Iranian citizen enter the USA on a Dutch passport?

Hostile Divisor Numbers

What's the 2-minute timer on mobile Deutsche Bahn tickets?

What is a common way to tell if an academic is "above average," or outstanding in their field? Is their h-index (Hirsh index) one of them?

What is the meaning of 「隣のおじいさんは言いました」

Endgame puzzle: How to avoid stalemate and win?

Copper as an adjective to refer to something made of copper

Make me a minimum magic sum

Collision domain question

What is monoid homomorphism exactly?

Given four points how can I find an equation for any pattern?

Dual frame in Riemannian metrics.

Ab major 9th chord in Bach

A 2-connected graph contains a path passing through all the odd degree vertices

Given a safe domain, are subdirectories safe as well?

HSA - Continue to Invest?

Debian 9 server no sshd in auth.log

Emergency stop in plain TeX, pdfTeX, XeTeX and LuaTeX?

Can anyone identify this unknown 1988 PC card from The Palantir Corporation?

TIP120 Transistor + Solenoid Failing Randomly

Reverse ColorFunction or ColorData

Summer '19 Sandbox error: String index out of range: 0: Source

How important are good looking people in a novel/story?



Should I wrap every prop with useCallback or useMemo, when to use this hooks?


How to pass props to this.props.childrenReact props not correctly set when wrapping an inputHow to store props passed on Click of an event in ReactTrigger onChange when new props are receivedReact child component state not updating when new props are passedReact.js onclick event: Cannot read property 'props' of undefinedReact hooks useMemo/useCallback skipPerformance penalty of creating handlers on every render with react-hooksReact useState - setValue rerenders the component even though the value is the sameReact Hooks useCallback causes child to re-render






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








7















With react hooks now available should I in case of functional components wrap every function passed with props with useCallback and every other props value with useMemo?



Also having custom function inside my component dependent on any props value should I wrap it with useCallback?



What are good practices to decide which props or const values from component wrap with this hooks ?



If this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?



Lets consider custom button where we wrap click handler and add custom logic



function ExampleCustomButton( onClick ) 
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (typeof onClick === 'function')
onClick(event);


// do custom stuff

,
[onClick]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



Lets consider custom button where we wrap click handler and add custom logic on condition



function ExampleCustomButton( someBool ) 
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (someBool)
// do custom stuff

,
[someBool]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



Should i in this two cases wrap my handler with useCallback ?



Similar case with use memo.



function ExampleCustomButton( someBool ) 
const memoizedSomeBool = useMemo(() => someBool, [someBool])
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (memoizedSomeBool)
// do custom stuff

,
[memoizedSomeBool]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



In this example I even pass memoized value to useCallback.



Another case what if in the component tree many components memoize same value ? How does this impact performance ?










share|improve this question
























  • Well, definitely not every time, all the time : ) Their use is situational. I'd say look into actually using these when you start experiencing performance hurdles.

    – Powell Ye
    Mar 25 at 12:58











  • Thanks @Powell_v2 for your comment, but if this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?

    – Vardius
    Mar 26 at 5:29











  • I guess if that was viable, React would to it automatically instead of exposing these as separate APIs. As @jalooc pointed out, there are costs associated with memoizing callbacks/values. Code cluttering is also a concern.

    – Powell Ye
    Mar 27 at 13:00











  • If the click handler doesn't use any of the component's props within it, then you can declare it outside of the component and then the handler function won't get re-created on every prop change of the component (since it's outside..)

    – vsync
    Apr 1 at 8:20

















7















With react hooks now available should I in case of functional components wrap every function passed with props with useCallback and every other props value with useMemo?



Also having custom function inside my component dependent on any props value should I wrap it with useCallback?



What are good practices to decide which props or const values from component wrap with this hooks ?



If this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?



Lets consider custom button where we wrap click handler and add custom logic



function ExampleCustomButton( onClick ) 
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (typeof onClick === 'function')
onClick(event);


// do custom stuff

,
[onClick]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



Lets consider custom button where we wrap click handler and add custom logic on condition



function ExampleCustomButton( someBool ) 
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (someBool)
// do custom stuff

,
[someBool]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



Should i in this two cases wrap my handler with useCallback ?



Similar case with use memo.



function ExampleCustomButton( someBool ) 
const memoizedSomeBool = useMemo(() => someBool, [someBool])
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (memoizedSomeBool)
// do custom stuff

,
[memoizedSomeBool]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



In this example I even pass memoized value to useCallback.



Another case what if in the component tree many components memoize same value ? How does this impact performance ?










share|improve this question
























  • Well, definitely not every time, all the time : ) Their use is situational. I'd say look into actually using these when you start experiencing performance hurdles.

    – Powell Ye
    Mar 25 at 12:58











  • Thanks @Powell_v2 for your comment, but if this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?

    – Vardius
    Mar 26 at 5:29











  • I guess if that was viable, React would to it automatically instead of exposing these as separate APIs. As @jalooc pointed out, there are costs associated with memoizing callbacks/values. Code cluttering is also a concern.

    – Powell Ye
    Mar 27 at 13:00











  • If the click handler doesn't use any of the component's props within it, then you can declare it outside of the component and then the handler function won't get re-created on every prop change of the component (since it's outside..)

    – vsync
    Apr 1 at 8:20













7












7








7


2






With react hooks now available should I in case of functional components wrap every function passed with props with useCallback and every other props value with useMemo?



Also having custom function inside my component dependent on any props value should I wrap it with useCallback?



What are good practices to decide which props or const values from component wrap with this hooks ?



If this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?



Lets consider custom button where we wrap click handler and add custom logic



function ExampleCustomButton( onClick ) 
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (typeof onClick === 'function')
onClick(event);


// do custom stuff

,
[onClick]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



Lets consider custom button where we wrap click handler and add custom logic on condition



function ExampleCustomButton( someBool ) 
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (someBool)
// do custom stuff

,
[someBool]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



Should i in this two cases wrap my handler with useCallback ?



Similar case with use memo.



function ExampleCustomButton( someBool ) 
const memoizedSomeBool = useMemo(() => someBool, [someBool])
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (memoizedSomeBool)
// do custom stuff

,
[memoizedSomeBool]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



In this example I even pass memoized value to useCallback.



Another case what if in the component tree many components memoize same value ? How does this impact performance ?










share|improve this question
















With react hooks now available should I in case of functional components wrap every function passed with props with useCallback and every other props value with useMemo?



Also having custom function inside my component dependent on any props value should I wrap it with useCallback?



What are good practices to decide which props or const values from component wrap with this hooks ?



If this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?



Lets consider custom button where we wrap click handler and add custom logic



function ExampleCustomButton( onClick ) 
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (typeof onClick === 'function')
onClick(event);


// do custom stuff

,
[onClick]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



Lets consider custom button where we wrap click handler and add custom logic on condition



function ExampleCustomButton( someBool ) 
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (someBool)
// do custom stuff

,
[someBool]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



Should i in this two cases wrap my handler with useCallback ?



Similar case with use memo.



function ExampleCustomButton( someBool ) 
const memoizedSomeBool = useMemo(() => someBool, [someBool])
const handleClick = useCallback(
(event) =>
if (memoizedSomeBool)
// do custom stuff

,
[memoizedSomeBool]
);

return <Button onClick=handleClick />;



In this example I even pass memoized value to useCallback.



Another case what if in the component tree many components memoize same value ? How does this impact performance ?







reactjs react-hooks






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 26 at 5:28







Vardius

















asked Mar 23 at 4:45









VardiusVardius

3,02133568




3,02133568












  • Well, definitely not every time, all the time : ) Their use is situational. I'd say look into actually using these when you start experiencing performance hurdles.

    – Powell Ye
    Mar 25 at 12:58











  • Thanks @Powell_v2 for your comment, but if this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?

    – Vardius
    Mar 26 at 5:29











  • I guess if that was viable, React would to it automatically instead of exposing these as separate APIs. As @jalooc pointed out, there are costs associated with memoizing callbacks/values. Code cluttering is also a concern.

    – Powell Ye
    Mar 27 at 13:00











  • If the click handler doesn't use any of the component's props within it, then you can declare it outside of the component and then the handler function won't get re-created on every prop change of the component (since it's outside..)

    – vsync
    Apr 1 at 8:20

















  • Well, definitely not every time, all the time : ) Their use is situational. I'd say look into actually using these when you start experiencing performance hurdles.

    – Powell Ye
    Mar 25 at 12:58











  • Thanks @Powell_v2 for your comment, but if this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?

    – Vardius
    Mar 26 at 5:29











  • I guess if that was viable, React would to it automatically instead of exposing these as separate APIs. As @jalooc pointed out, there are costs associated with memoizing callbacks/values. Code cluttering is also a concern.

    – Powell Ye
    Mar 27 at 13:00











  • If the click handler doesn't use any of the component's props within it, then you can declare it outside of the component and then the handler function won't get re-created on every prop change of the component (since it's outside..)

    – vsync
    Apr 1 at 8:20
















Well, definitely not every time, all the time : ) Their use is situational. I'd say look into actually using these when you start experiencing performance hurdles.

– Powell Ye
Mar 25 at 12:58





Well, definitely not every time, all the time : ) Their use is situational. I'd say look into actually using these when you start experiencing performance hurdles.

– Powell Ye
Mar 25 at 12:58













Thanks @Powell_v2 for your comment, but if this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?

– Vardius
Mar 26 at 5:29





Thanks @Powell_v2 for your comment, but if this improves performance why not to do it at all times ?

– Vardius
Mar 26 at 5:29













I guess if that was viable, React would to it automatically instead of exposing these as separate APIs. As @jalooc pointed out, there are costs associated with memoizing callbacks/values. Code cluttering is also a concern.

– Powell Ye
Mar 27 at 13:00





I guess if that was viable, React would to it automatically instead of exposing these as separate APIs. As @jalooc pointed out, there are costs associated with memoizing callbacks/values. Code cluttering is also a concern.

– Powell Ye
Mar 27 at 13:00













If the click handler doesn't use any of the component's props within it, then you can declare it outside of the component and then the handler function won't get re-created on every prop change of the component (since it's outside..)

– vsync
Apr 1 at 8:20





If the click handler doesn't use any of the component's props within it, then you can declare it outside of the component and then the handler function won't get re-created on every prop change of the component (since it's outside..)

– vsync
Apr 1 at 8:20












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Not worth it, for multiple reasons:



  1. Even official docs say you should do it only when necessary.

  2. Keep in mind that premature optimization is the root of all evil :)

  3. It makes DX (developer experience) far worse: it's harder to read; harder to write; harder to refactor.

  4. When dealing with primitives (like in your example) memoizing costs more CPU power than not doing it. A primitive value doesn't have a concept of references, so there's nothing to memoize in them. On the other hand, memoization itself (as any other hook) does require some tiny processing, nothing is for free. Even though it's tiny, it's still more than nothing (compared to just passing a primitive through), so you'd shoot your own foot with this approach.

To put all together - you'd waste more time typing all the hooks than a user would gain on having them in the application if you want to put them everywhere. The good old rule applies: Measure, then optimize.






share|improve this answer






























    2














    I agree with the principles proposed by @jalooc



    To give some more insight about the exhibited use cases in the OP, here is my advice:



    Expensive children renders



    function Component() 
    const callback = useCallback(() => dostuff , [deps])

    return <Child prop=callback />



    The above makes sense if Child is a very expensive component to render. As such, it is probably exported like so:



    function Child() 
    ...this takes significant CPU...


    // Export as a pure component
    export default React.memo(Child)


    Expensive computations



    function Component( foo ) 
    // This very expensive computation will only run when it's input (foo)
    // changes, allowing Component to re-render without performance issues
    const bar = useMemo(() =>
    ... something very complicated with `foo` ...
    , [foo])

    return <div>bar</div>



    Conclusion



    1. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance

    2. If a function that changes at render causes derived expensive computations, memoize it (useCallback) or move it outside the scope if you can.

    3. If a component itself is expensive to render, make it pure with React.memo, with the help of #2 if necessary

    4. If something IS itself expensive to re-compute, memoize it (useMemo)

    5. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance





    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55310682%2fshould-i-wrap-every-prop-with-usecallback-or-usememo-when-to-use-this-hooks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5














      Not worth it, for multiple reasons:



      1. Even official docs say you should do it only when necessary.

      2. Keep in mind that premature optimization is the root of all evil :)

      3. It makes DX (developer experience) far worse: it's harder to read; harder to write; harder to refactor.

      4. When dealing with primitives (like in your example) memoizing costs more CPU power than not doing it. A primitive value doesn't have a concept of references, so there's nothing to memoize in them. On the other hand, memoization itself (as any other hook) does require some tiny processing, nothing is for free. Even though it's tiny, it's still more than nothing (compared to just passing a primitive through), so you'd shoot your own foot with this approach.

      To put all together - you'd waste more time typing all the hooks than a user would gain on having them in the application if you want to put them everywhere. The good old rule applies: Measure, then optimize.






      share|improve this answer



























        5














        Not worth it, for multiple reasons:



        1. Even official docs say you should do it only when necessary.

        2. Keep in mind that premature optimization is the root of all evil :)

        3. It makes DX (developer experience) far worse: it's harder to read; harder to write; harder to refactor.

        4. When dealing with primitives (like in your example) memoizing costs more CPU power than not doing it. A primitive value doesn't have a concept of references, so there's nothing to memoize in them. On the other hand, memoization itself (as any other hook) does require some tiny processing, nothing is for free. Even though it's tiny, it's still more than nothing (compared to just passing a primitive through), so you'd shoot your own foot with this approach.

        To put all together - you'd waste more time typing all the hooks than a user would gain on having them in the application if you want to put them everywhere. The good old rule applies: Measure, then optimize.






        share|improve this answer

























          5












          5








          5







          Not worth it, for multiple reasons:



          1. Even official docs say you should do it only when necessary.

          2. Keep in mind that premature optimization is the root of all evil :)

          3. It makes DX (developer experience) far worse: it's harder to read; harder to write; harder to refactor.

          4. When dealing with primitives (like in your example) memoizing costs more CPU power than not doing it. A primitive value doesn't have a concept of references, so there's nothing to memoize in them. On the other hand, memoization itself (as any other hook) does require some tiny processing, nothing is for free. Even though it's tiny, it's still more than nothing (compared to just passing a primitive through), so you'd shoot your own foot with this approach.

          To put all together - you'd waste more time typing all the hooks than a user would gain on having them in the application if you want to put them everywhere. The good old rule applies: Measure, then optimize.






          share|improve this answer













          Not worth it, for multiple reasons:



          1. Even official docs say you should do it only when necessary.

          2. Keep in mind that premature optimization is the root of all evil :)

          3. It makes DX (developer experience) far worse: it's harder to read; harder to write; harder to refactor.

          4. When dealing with primitives (like in your example) memoizing costs more CPU power than not doing it. A primitive value doesn't have a concept of references, so there's nothing to memoize in them. On the other hand, memoization itself (as any other hook) does require some tiny processing, nothing is for free. Even though it's tiny, it's still more than nothing (compared to just passing a primitive through), so you'd shoot your own foot with this approach.

          To put all together - you'd waste more time typing all the hooks than a user would gain on having them in the application if you want to put them everywhere. The good old rule applies: Measure, then optimize.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 27 at 7:25









          jaloocjalooc

          501517




          501517























              2














              I agree with the principles proposed by @jalooc



              To give some more insight about the exhibited use cases in the OP, here is my advice:



              Expensive children renders



              function Component() 
              const callback = useCallback(() => dostuff , [deps])

              return <Child prop=callback />



              The above makes sense if Child is a very expensive component to render. As such, it is probably exported like so:



              function Child() 
              ...this takes significant CPU...


              // Export as a pure component
              export default React.memo(Child)


              Expensive computations



              function Component( foo ) 
              // This very expensive computation will only run when it's input (foo)
              // changes, allowing Component to re-render without performance issues
              const bar = useMemo(() =>
              ... something very complicated with `foo` ...
              , [foo])

              return <div>bar</div>



              Conclusion



              1. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance

              2. If a function that changes at render causes derived expensive computations, memoize it (useCallback) or move it outside the scope if you can.

              3. If a component itself is expensive to render, make it pure with React.memo, with the help of #2 if necessary

              4. If something IS itself expensive to re-compute, memoize it (useMemo)

              5. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance





              share|improve this answer





























                2














                I agree with the principles proposed by @jalooc



                To give some more insight about the exhibited use cases in the OP, here is my advice:



                Expensive children renders



                function Component() 
                const callback = useCallback(() => dostuff , [deps])

                return <Child prop=callback />



                The above makes sense if Child is a very expensive component to render. As such, it is probably exported like so:



                function Child() 
                ...this takes significant CPU...


                // Export as a pure component
                export default React.memo(Child)


                Expensive computations



                function Component( foo ) 
                // This very expensive computation will only run when it's input (foo)
                // changes, allowing Component to re-render without performance issues
                const bar = useMemo(() =>
                ... something very complicated with `foo` ...
                , [foo])

                return <div>bar</div>



                Conclusion



                1. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance

                2. If a function that changes at render causes derived expensive computations, memoize it (useCallback) or move it outside the scope if you can.

                3. If a component itself is expensive to render, make it pure with React.memo, with the help of #2 if necessary

                4. If something IS itself expensive to re-compute, memoize it (useMemo)

                5. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance





                share|improve this answer



























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  I agree with the principles proposed by @jalooc



                  To give some more insight about the exhibited use cases in the OP, here is my advice:



                  Expensive children renders



                  function Component() 
                  const callback = useCallback(() => dostuff , [deps])

                  return <Child prop=callback />



                  The above makes sense if Child is a very expensive component to render. As such, it is probably exported like so:



                  function Child() 
                  ...this takes significant CPU...


                  // Export as a pure component
                  export default React.memo(Child)


                  Expensive computations



                  function Component( foo ) 
                  // This very expensive computation will only run when it's input (foo)
                  // changes, allowing Component to re-render without performance issues
                  const bar = useMemo(() =>
                  ... something very complicated with `foo` ...
                  , [foo])

                  return <div>bar</div>



                  Conclusion



                  1. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance

                  2. If a function that changes at render causes derived expensive computations, memoize it (useCallback) or move it outside the scope if you can.

                  3. If a component itself is expensive to render, make it pure with React.memo, with the help of #2 if necessary

                  4. If something IS itself expensive to re-compute, memoize it (useMemo)

                  5. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance





                  share|improve this answer















                  I agree with the principles proposed by @jalooc



                  To give some more insight about the exhibited use cases in the OP, here is my advice:



                  Expensive children renders



                  function Component() 
                  const callback = useCallback(() => dostuff , [deps])

                  return <Child prop=callback />



                  The above makes sense if Child is a very expensive component to render. As such, it is probably exported like so:



                  function Child() 
                  ...this takes significant CPU...


                  // Export as a pure component
                  export default React.memo(Child)


                  Expensive computations



                  function Component( foo ) 
                  // This very expensive computation will only run when it's input (foo)
                  // changes, allowing Component to re-render without performance issues
                  const bar = useMemo(() =>
                  ... something very complicated with `foo` ...
                  , [foo])

                  return <div>bar</div>



                  Conclusion



                  1. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance

                  2. If a function that changes at render causes derived expensive computations, memoize it (useCallback) or move it outside the scope if you can.

                  3. If a component itself is expensive to render, make it pure with React.memo, with the help of #2 if necessary

                  4. If something IS itself expensive to re-compute, memoize it (useMemo)

                  5. Do what makes sense or that have measured bad performance






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 29 at 11:05

























                  answered Mar 29 at 0:09









                  PandaioloPandaiolo

                  3,88622153




                  3,88622153



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55310682%2fshould-i-wrap-every-prop-with-usecallback-or-usememo-when-to-use-this-hooks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                      SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

                      은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현