Testnet seem to not support Corda4 with SignatureConstraintSimple PBFT issueHow to download network-bootstrapper-corda-1.0.jar?Is there a limit to the number of inputs/outputs states during transaction building?Why does contract upgrade throw casting error on counterparty during verifyProposal?One issue when I tried to use a new version cordapp in local testStates pointing to the new contract version still tries to deserialise old contract?In Corda, NullPointerException when calling DataVendingFlowScheduled flows fail while accessing a single or a small set of Cash statesHow to call subflow in FlowResponderCorda fails to perform a simple flow with “Exception while scanning” caused by Java heap space OOM
King or Queen-Which piece is which?
I found a password with hashcat, but it doesn't work
Fantaisie Impromptu - Specific fingering issue
"Correct me if I'm wrong"
Umlaut character order when sorting
What mathematical theory is required for high frequency trading?
Methodology: Writing unit tests for another developer
Is there a term for the belief that "if it's legal, it's moral"?
Can I enter the UK for 24 hours from a Schengen area, holding an Indian passport?
Novel in which alien (Martian?) is trapped on Earth in prehistory
What triggered jesuits' ban on infinitesimals in 1632?
Explicit song lyrics checker
Should I include an appendix for inessential, yet related worldbuilding to my story?
What happened to Hopper's girlfriend in season one?
Justifying Affordable Bespoke Spaceships
Counterfeit checks were created for my account. How does this type of fraud work?
Dmesg full of I/O errors, smart ok, four disks affected
Non-misogynistic way to say “asshole”?
How do internally carried IR missiles acquire a lock?
How did Gollum enter Moria?
What is the meaning of "понаехать"?
Extending prime numbers digit by digit while retaining primality
Did the CIA blow up a Siberian pipeline in 1982?
Boss wants someone else to lead a project based on the idea I presented to him
Testnet seem to not support Corda4 with SignatureConstraint
Simple PBFT issueHow to download network-bootstrapper-corda-1.0.jar?Is there a limit to the number of inputs/outputs states during transaction building?Why does contract upgrade throw casting error on counterparty during verifyProposal?One issue when I tried to use a new version cordapp in local testStates pointing to the new contract version still tries to deserialise old contract?In Corda, NullPointerException when calling DataVendingFlowScheduled flows fail while accessing a single or a small set of Cash statesHow to call subflow in FlowResponderCorda fails to perform a simple flow with “Exception while scanning” caused by Java heap space OOM
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I build Corda4 with SignatureConstraint and deploy with Testnet. Then when I make transaction I got this exception
net.corda.core.node.ZoneVersionTooLowException: Signature constraints requires all nodes on the Corda compatibility zone to be running at least platform version 4. The current zone is only enforcing a minimum platform version of 1. Please contact your zone operator.
at net.corda.core.internal.CordaUtilsKt.checkMinimumPlatformVersion(CordaUtils.kt:36) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.internal.Verifier.verifyConstraints(TransactionVerifierServiceInternal.kt:332) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.internal.Verifier.verify(TransactionVerifierServiceInternal.kt:61) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.LedgerTransaction.verify(LedgerTransaction.kt:125) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.addMissingDependency(TransactionBuilder.kt:173) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransactionWithContext$core(TransactionBuilder.kt:160) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransactionWithContext$core$default(TransactionBuilder.kt:128) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransaction(TransactionBuilder.kt:125) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toLedgerTransaction(TransactionBuilder.kt:451) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.verify(TransactionBuilder.kt:459) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at th.co.jventures.ddlp.cordapp.flows.CustomerIssueFlow.call(CustomerIssueFlow.kt:166) ~[cordapp-flows-1.0.jar:?]
at th.co.jventures.ddlp.cordapp.flows.CustomerIssueFlow.call(CustomerIssueFlow.kt:32) ~[cordapp-flows-1.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.node.services.statemachine.FlowStateMachineImpl.run(FlowStateMachineImpl.kt:228) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.node.services.statemachine.FlowStateMachineImpl.run(FlowStateMachineImpl.kt:45) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.Fiber.run1(Fiber.java:1092) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.Fiber.exec(Fiber.java:788) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.RunnableFiberTask.doExec(RunnableFiberTask.java:100) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.RunnableFiberTask.run(RunnableFiberTask.java:91) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at net.corda.node.utilities.AffinityExecutor$ServiceAffinityExecutor$1$thread$1.run(AffinityExecutor.kt:63) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
Is this mean Testnet not support Signature constraint right?
corda
asked Mar 25 at 7:14
Satienpong YoteeSatienpong Yotee
174
add a comment |
I build Corda4 with SignatureConstraint and deploy with Testnet. Then when I make transaction I got this exception
net.corda.core.node.ZoneVersionTooLowException: Signature constraints requires all nodes on the Corda compatibility zone to be running at least platform version 4. The current zone is only enforcing a minimum platform version of 1. Please contact your zone operator.
at net.corda.core.internal.CordaUtilsKt.checkMinimumPlatformVersion(CordaUtils.kt:36) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.internal.Verifier.verifyConstraints(TransactionVerifierServiceInternal.kt:332) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.internal.Verifier.verify(TransactionVerifierServiceInternal.kt:61) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.LedgerTransaction.verify(LedgerTransaction.kt:125) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.addMissingDependency(TransactionBuilder.kt:173) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransactionWithContext$core(TransactionBuilder.kt:160) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransactionWithContext$core$default(TransactionBuilder.kt:128) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransaction(TransactionBuilder.kt:125) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toLedgerTransaction(TransactionBuilder.kt:451) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.verify(TransactionBuilder.kt:459) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at th.co.jventures.ddlp.cordapp.flows.CustomerIssueFlow.call(CustomerIssueFlow.kt:166) ~[cordapp-flows-1.0.jar:?]
at th.co.jventures.ddlp.cordapp.flows.CustomerIssueFlow.call(CustomerIssueFlow.kt:32) ~[cordapp-flows-1.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.node.services.statemachine.FlowStateMachineImpl.run(FlowStateMachineImpl.kt:228) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.node.services.statemachine.FlowStateMachineImpl.run(FlowStateMachineImpl.kt:45) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.Fiber.run1(Fiber.java:1092) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.Fiber.exec(Fiber.java:788) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.RunnableFiberTask.doExec(RunnableFiberTask.java:100) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.RunnableFiberTask.run(RunnableFiberTask.java:91) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at net.corda.node.utilities.AffinityExecutor$ServiceAffinityExecutor$1$thread$1.run(AffinityExecutor.kt:63) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
Is this mean Testnet not support Signature constraint right?
corda
asked Mar 25 at 7:14
Satienpong YoteeSatienpong Yotee
174
add a comment |
I build Corda4 with SignatureConstraint and deploy with Testnet. Then when I make transaction I got this exception
net.corda.core.node.ZoneVersionTooLowException: Signature constraints requires all nodes on the Corda compatibility zone to be running at least platform version 4. The current zone is only enforcing a minimum platform version of 1. Please contact your zone operator.
at net.corda.core.internal.CordaUtilsKt.checkMinimumPlatformVersion(CordaUtils.kt:36) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.internal.Verifier.verifyConstraints(TransactionVerifierServiceInternal.kt:332) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.internal.Verifier.verify(TransactionVerifierServiceInternal.kt:61) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.LedgerTransaction.verify(LedgerTransaction.kt:125) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.addMissingDependency(TransactionBuilder.kt:173) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransactionWithContext$core(TransactionBuilder.kt:160) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransactionWithContext$core$default(TransactionBuilder.kt:128) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransaction(TransactionBuilder.kt:125) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toLedgerTransaction(TransactionBuilder.kt:451) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.verify(TransactionBuilder.kt:459) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at th.co.jventures.ddlp.cordapp.flows.CustomerIssueFlow.call(CustomerIssueFlow.kt:166) ~[cordapp-flows-1.0.jar:?]
at th.co.jventures.ddlp.cordapp.flows.CustomerIssueFlow.call(CustomerIssueFlow.kt:32) ~[cordapp-flows-1.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.node.services.statemachine.FlowStateMachineImpl.run(FlowStateMachineImpl.kt:228) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.node.services.statemachine.FlowStateMachineImpl.run(FlowStateMachineImpl.kt:45) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.Fiber.run1(Fiber.java:1092) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.Fiber.exec(Fiber.java:788) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.RunnableFiberTask.doExec(RunnableFiberTask.java:100) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.RunnableFiberTask.run(RunnableFiberTask.java:91) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at net.corda.node.utilities.AffinityExecutor$ServiceAffinityExecutor$1$thread$1.run(AffinityExecutor.kt:63) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
Is this mean Testnet not support Signature constraint right?
corda
asked Mar 25 at 7:14
Satienpong YoteeSatienpong Yotee
174
I build Corda4 with SignatureConstraint and deploy with Testnet. Then when I make transaction I got this exception
net.corda.core.node.ZoneVersionTooLowException: Signature constraints requires all nodes on the Corda compatibility zone to be running at least platform version 4. The current zone is only enforcing a minimum platform version of 1. Please contact your zone operator.
at net.corda.core.internal.CordaUtilsKt.checkMinimumPlatformVersion(CordaUtils.kt:36) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.internal.Verifier.verifyConstraints(TransactionVerifierServiceInternal.kt:332) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.internal.Verifier.verify(TransactionVerifierServiceInternal.kt:61) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.LedgerTransaction.verify(LedgerTransaction.kt:125) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.addMissingDependency(TransactionBuilder.kt:173) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransactionWithContext$core(TransactionBuilder.kt:160) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransactionWithContext$core$default(TransactionBuilder.kt:128) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toWireTransaction(TransactionBuilder.kt:125) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.toLedgerTransaction(TransactionBuilder.kt:451) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.core.transactions.TransactionBuilder.verify(TransactionBuilder.kt:459) ~[corda-core-4.0.jar:?]
at th.co.jventures.ddlp.cordapp.flows.CustomerIssueFlow.call(CustomerIssueFlow.kt:166) ~[cordapp-flows-1.0.jar:?]
at th.co.jventures.ddlp.cordapp.flows.CustomerIssueFlow.call(CustomerIssueFlow.kt:32) ~[cordapp-flows-1.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.node.services.statemachine.FlowStateMachineImpl.run(FlowStateMachineImpl.kt:228) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
at net.corda.node.services.statemachine.FlowStateMachineImpl.run(FlowStateMachineImpl.kt:45) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.Fiber.run1(Fiber.java:1092) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.Fiber.exec(Fiber.java:788) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.RunnableFiberTask.doExec(RunnableFiberTask.java:100) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at co.paralleluniverse.fibers.RunnableFiberTask.run(RunnableFiberTask.java:91) ~[quasar-core-0.7.10-jdk8.jar:0.7.10]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) ~[?:1.8.0_201]
at net.corda.node.utilities.AffinityExecutor$ServiceAffinityExecutor$1$thread$1.run(AffinityExecutor.kt:63) ~[corda-node-4.0.jar:?]
Is this mean Testnet not support Signature constraint right?
corda
corda
asked Mar 25 at 7:14
Satienpong YoteeSatienpong Yotee
174
asked Mar 25 at 7:14
Satienpong YoteeSatienpong Yotee
174
edited Mar 25 at 7:22
Satienpong Yotee
asked Mar 25 at 7:14
Satienpong YoteeSatienpong Yotee
174
asked Mar 25 at 7:14
Satienpong YoteeSatienpong Yotee
174
asked Mar 25 at 7:14
Satienpong YoteeSatienpong Yotee
174
174
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The Corda Testnet is minimum platform version 1 at this time. There is a new Testnet with a minimum platform version of 4 coming out in due course that will support Corda V4 and therefore signature constraints.
Source: I am the tech lead of the R3 Corda Testnet.
answered Mar 25 at 15:01
ClintonioClintonio
369411
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55332803%2ftestnet-seem-to-not-support-corda4-with-signatureconstraint%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The Corda Testnet is minimum platform version 1 at this time. There is a new Testnet with a minimum platform version of 4 coming out in due course that will support Corda V4 and therefore signature constraints.
Source: I am the tech lead of the R3 Corda Testnet.
answered Mar 25 at 15:01
ClintonioClintonio
369411
add a comment |
The Corda Testnet is minimum platform version 1 at this time. There is a new Testnet with a minimum platform version of 4 coming out in due course that will support Corda V4 and therefore signature constraints.
Source: I am the tech lead of the R3 Corda Testnet.
answered Mar 25 at 15:01
ClintonioClintonio
369411
add a comment |
The Corda Testnet is minimum platform version 1 at this time. There is a new Testnet with a minimum platform version of 4 coming out in due course that will support Corda V4 and therefore signature constraints.
Source: I am the tech lead of the R3 Corda Testnet.
answered Mar 25 at 15:01
ClintonioClintonio
369411
The Corda Testnet is minimum platform version 1 at this time. There is a new Testnet with a minimum platform version of 4 coming out in due course that will support Corda V4 and therefore signature constraints.
Source: I am the tech lead of the R3 Corda Testnet.
answered Mar 25 at 15:01
ClintonioClintonio
369411
answered Mar 25 at 15:01
ClintonioClintonio
369411
answered Mar 25 at 15:01
ClintonioClintonio
369411
answered Mar 25 at 15:01
ClintonioClintonio
369411
369411
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55332803%2ftestnet-seem-to-not-support-corda4-with-signatureconstraint%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
