DAX code change from calculated column to a measureCreating DAX peer measureCreate a Running Total Measure in DAX from another Measure (not Calculated Column)How to refer to a single value in a Calculated Column in a measure (DAX)Condition with multiple columns in DAXMeasure in DAX to calculate YTD for chosen month only for Power BIMax partition by DAX measure equivalent?Power BI - DAX measure to calculate sales first 31 days - 'DATEADD' expects a contiguous selectionAverage of a DAX measure Power BIHow to calculate the MAX from a Dax Measure (Excel)DAX calculated column does not work in a measure calculation

How often should alkaline batteries be checked when they are in a device?

Chemistry Riddle

What kind of anatomy does a centaur have?

Was US film used in Luna 3?

Wiring IKEA light fixture into old fixture

Dedicated to our #1 Fan

The seven story archetypes. Are they truly all of them?

What rules turn any attack that hits a given target into a critical hit?

Impact of throwing away fruit waste on a peak > 3200 m above a glacier

Found more old paper shares from broken up companies

High income and difficulty during interviews

Were Moshe's sons Jewish?

How can I print a 1 cm overhang with minimal supports?

How can I calculate the cost of Skyss bus tickets

Is it possible to access the complete command line including pipes in a bash script?

Why is the UH-60 tail rotor canted?

Ultraproduct of Dividing Lines

Does Impedance Matching Imply any Practical RF Transmitter Must Waste >=50% of Energy?

How to Sow[] until I've Reap[]'d enough?

Import data from a current web session?

Is there a way to shorten this while condition?

Killing a star safely

Short story where a flexible reality hardens to an unchanging one

Why did computer video outputs go from digital to analog, then back to digital?



DAX code change from calculated column to a measure


Creating DAX peer measureCreate a Running Total Measure in DAX from another Measure (not Calculated Column)How to refer to a single value in a Calculated Column in a measure (DAX)Condition with multiple columns in DAXMeasure in DAX to calculate YTD for chosen month only for Power BIMax partition by DAX measure equivalent?Power BI - DAX measure to calculate sales first 31 days - 'DATEADD' expects a contiguous selectionAverage of a DAX measure Power BIHow to calculate the MAX from a Dax Measure (Excel)DAX calculated column does not work in a measure calculation






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I have a fact table with settlement_date, product_id, service_id, location_id, and ticket_id and srv_adjusted_earning columns.



I have determined the DAX query to generate a calculated column that sums the srv_adjusted_earning column over the date range: settlement date and settlement date - 27 days (i.e. a 4 week window) as:



=CALCULATE(
SUM(factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING]),
DATESBETWEEN
(
factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
DATEADD(factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE], -27, DAY),
factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]
),
FILTER(factService, factService[PRO_ID] = EARLIER(factService[PRO_ID])),
FILTER(factService, factService[SER_ID] = EARLIER(factService[SER_ID])),
FILTER(factService, factService[LOC_ID_SELLING] =
EARLIER(factService[LOC_ID_SELLING])),
FILTER(factService, factService[TIS_ID] = EARLIER(factService[TIS_ID]))
)


I am trying to convert this DAX calculated column to a measure and I tried the following:



blob:=CALCULATE
(
SUM(factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING]),
DATESBETWEEN
(
factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
DATEADD(factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE], -27, DAY),
factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]
),
ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[PRO_ID]),
ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[SER_ID]),
ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[LOC_ID_SELLING]),
ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[TIS_ID])
)


But I get:
Error: Calculation error in measure 'factService'[blob]: A single value for column 'SETTLEMENT_DATE' in table 'factService' cannot be determined. This can happen when a measure formula refers to a column that contains many values without specifying an aggregation such as min, max, count, or sum to get a single result.



Anybody know how I fix this?










share|improve this question






























    1















    I have a fact table with settlement_date, product_id, service_id, location_id, and ticket_id and srv_adjusted_earning columns.



    I have determined the DAX query to generate a calculated column that sums the srv_adjusted_earning column over the date range: settlement date and settlement date - 27 days (i.e. a 4 week window) as:



    =CALCULATE(
    SUM(factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING]),
    DATESBETWEEN
    (
    factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
    DATEADD(factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE], -27, DAY),
    factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]
    ),
    FILTER(factService, factService[PRO_ID] = EARLIER(factService[PRO_ID])),
    FILTER(factService, factService[SER_ID] = EARLIER(factService[SER_ID])),
    FILTER(factService, factService[LOC_ID_SELLING] =
    EARLIER(factService[LOC_ID_SELLING])),
    FILTER(factService, factService[TIS_ID] = EARLIER(factService[TIS_ID]))
    )


    I am trying to convert this DAX calculated column to a measure and I tried the following:



    blob:=CALCULATE
    (
    SUM(factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING]),
    DATESBETWEEN
    (
    factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
    DATEADD(factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE], -27, DAY),
    factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]
    ),
    ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[PRO_ID]),
    ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[SER_ID]),
    ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[LOC_ID_SELLING]),
    ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[TIS_ID])
    )


    But I get:
    Error: Calculation error in measure 'factService'[blob]: A single value for column 'SETTLEMENT_DATE' in table 'factService' cannot be determined. This can happen when a measure formula refers to a column that contains many values without specifying an aggregation such as min, max, count, or sum to get a single result.



    Anybody know how I fix this?










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      I have a fact table with settlement_date, product_id, service_id, location_id, and ticket_id and srv_adjusted_earning columns.



      I have determined the DAX query to generate a calculated column that sums the srv_adjusted_earning column over the date range: settlement date and settlement date - 27 days (i.e. a 4 week window) as:



      =CALCULATE(
      SUM(factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING]),
      DATESBETWEEN
      (
      factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
      DATEADD(factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE], -27, DAY),
      factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]
      ),
      FILTER(factService, factService[PRO_ID] = EARLIER(factService[PRO_ID])),
      FILTER(factService, factService[SER_ID] = EARLIER(factService[SER_ID])),
      FILTER(factService, factService[LOC_ID_SELLING] =
      EARLIER(factService[LOC_ID_SELLING])),
      FILTER(factService, factService[TIS_ID] = EARLIER(factService[TIS_ID]))
      )


      I am trying to convert this DAX calculated column to a measure and I tried the following:



      blob:=CALCULATE
      (
      SUM(factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING]),
      DATESBETWEEN
      (
      factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
      DATEADD(factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE], -27, DAY),
      factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]
      ),
      ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[PRO_ID]),
      ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[SER_ID]),
      ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[LOC_ID_SELLING]),
      ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[TIS_ID])
      )


      But I get:
      Error: Calculation error in measure 'factService'[blob]: A single value for column 'SETTLEMENT_DATE' in table 'factService' cannot be determined. This can happen when a measure formula refers to a column that contains many values without specifying an aggregation such as min, max, count, or sum to get a single result.



      Anybody know how I fix this?










      share|improve this question
















      I have a fact table with settlement_date, product_id, service_id, location_id, and ticket_id and srv_adjusted_earning columns.



      I have determined the DAX query to generate a calculated column that sums the srv_adjusted_earning column over the date range: settlement date and settlement date - 27 days (i.e. a 4 week window) as:



      =CALCULATE(
      SUM(factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING]),
      DATESBETWEEN
      (
      factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
      DATEADD(factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE], -27, DAY),
      factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]
      ),
      FILTER(factService, factService[PRO_ID] = EARLIER(factService[PRO_ID])),
      FILTER(factService, factService[SER_ID] = EARLIER(factService[SER_ID])),
      FILTER(factService, factService[LOC_ID_SELLING] =
      EARLIER(factService[LOC_ID_SELLING])),
      FILTER(factService, factService[TIS_ID] = EARLIER(factService[TIS_ID]))
      )


      I am trying to convert this DAX calculated column to a measure and I tried the following:



      blob:=CALCULATE
      (
      SUM(factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING]),
      DATESBETWEEN
      (
      factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
      DATEADD(factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE], -27, DAY),
      factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]
      ),
      ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[PRO_ID]),
      ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[SER_ID]),
      ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[LOC_ID_SELLING]),
      ALLEXCEPT(factService, factService[TIS_ID])
      )


      But I get:
      Error: Calculation error in measure 'factService'[blob]: A single value for column 'SETTLEMENT_DATE' in table 'factService' cannot be determined. This can happen when a measure formula refers to a column that contains many values without specifying an aggregation such as min, max, count, or sum to get a single result.



      Anybody know how I fix this?







      dax calculated-columns measure






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 26 at 14:43







      Stuart5069

















      asked Mar 26 at 14:37









      Stuart5069Stuart5069

      103 bronze badges




      103 bronze badges






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          As the error mentions, the issue is with factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]. In the measure, there is no row context so that it knows which date you are talking about, so you need to specify it somehow. I'd suggest using a variable along these lines:



          blob :=
          VAR SettleDate = MAX ( factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE] )
          RETURN
          CALCULATE (
          SUM ( factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING] ),
          DATESBETWEEN (
          factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
          SettleDate - 27,
          SettleDate
          ),
          ALLEXCEPT (
          factService,
          factService[PRO_ID],
          factService[SER_ID],
          factService[LOC_ID_SELLING],
          factService[TIS_ID]
          )
          )


          Here the variable picks the maximal settlement date in the current filter context. If that's not exactly what you need, adjust the definition accordingly.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks for your response. That throws the error: "Semantic error: the first argument to "DATEADD" must specify a column. Also I am looking to take the dates 28 relative to the date in the row, so given Feb 28th that would be 1st to 28th Feb inclusive. Wouldn't the MAX take the largest date in the fact?

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 26 at 16:32












          • Ah, I forgot DATEADD needs a date column as the first argument. As far as the MAX goes, it takes the max in the current filter context, not necessarily over the whole fact table. Try my edit.

            – Alexis Olson
            Mar 26 at 18:34











          • Thanks again for the quick response. That solves the semantic error and you are correct that the MAX is in the filter context. I have created the calculated field and compared to the calculated column and the answers are the same, and I have marked your post as the correct answer. I trawled the net and the Russo/Ferrari book for an answer without joy so I cannot thank you enough for your post. Nice trick to use the variable to force the filter context - I won't forget that one.

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 27 at 9:59










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55359816%2fdax-code-change-from-calculated-column-to-a-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          As the error mentions, the issue is with factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]. In the measure, there is no row context so that it knows which date you are talking about, so you need to specify it somehow. I'd suggest using a variable along these lines:



          blob :=
          VAR SettleDate = MAX ( factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE] )
          RETURN
          CALCULATE (
          SUM ( factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING] ),
          DATESBETWEEN (
          factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
          SettleDate - 27,
          SettleDate
          ),
          ALLEXCEPT (
          factService,
          factService[PRO_ID],
          factService[SER_ID],
          factService[LOC_ID_SELLING],
          factService[TIS_ID]
          )
          )


          Here the variable picks the maximal settlement date in the current filter context. If that's not exactly what you need, adjust the definition accordingly.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks for your response. That throws the error: "Semantic error: the first argument to "DATEADD" must specify a column. Also I am looking to take the dates 28 relative to the date in the row, so given Feb 28th that would be 1st to 28th Feb inclusive. Wouldn't the MAX take the largest date in the fact?

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 26 at 16:32












          • Ah, I forgot DATEADD needs a date column as the first argument. As far as the MAX goes, it takes the max in the current filter context, not necessarily over the whole fact table. Try my edit.

            – Alexis Olson
            Mar 26 at 18:34











          • Thanks again for the quick response. That solves the semantic error and you are correct that the MAX is in the filter context. I have created the calculated field and compared to the calculated column and the answers are the same, and I have marked your post as the correct answer. I trawled the net and the Russo/Ferrari book for an answer without joy so I cannot thank you enough for your post. Nice trick to use the variable to force the filter context - I won't forget that one.

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 27 at 9:59















          0














          As the error mentions, the issue is with factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]. In the measure, there is no row context so that it knows which date you are talking about, so you need to specify it somehow. I'd suggest using a variable along these lines:



          blob :=
          VAR SettleDate = MAX ( factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE] )
          RETURN
          CALCULATE (
          SUM ( factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING] ),
          DATESBETWEEN (
          factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
          SettleDate - 27,
          SettleDate
          ),
          ALLEXCEPT (
          factService,
          factService[PRO_ID],
          factService[SER_ID],
          factService[LOC_ID_SELLING],
          factService[TIS_ID]
          )
          )


          Here the variable picks the maximal settlement date in the current filter context. If that's not exactly what you need, adjust the definition accordingly.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks for your response. That throws the error: "Semantic error: the first argument to "DATEADD" must specify a column. Also I am looking to take the dates 28 relative to the date in the row, so given Feb 28th that would be 1st to 28th Feb inclusive. Wouldn't the MAX take the largest date in the fact?

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 26 at 16:32












          • Ah, I forgot DATEADD needs a date column as the first argument. As far as the MAX goes, it takes the max in the current filter context, not necessarily over the whole fact table. Try my edit.

            – Alexis Olson
            Mar 26 at 18:34











          • Thanks again for the quick response. That solves the semantic error and you are correct that the MAX is in the filter context. I have created the calculated field and compared to the calculated column and the answers are the same, and I have marked your post as the correct answer. I trawled the net and the Russo/Ferrari book for an answer without joy so I cannot thank you enough for your post. Nice trick to use the variable to force the filter context - I won't forget that one.

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 27 at 9:59













          0












          0








          0







          As the error mentions, the issue is with factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]. In the measure, there is no row context so that it knows which date you are talking about, so you need to specify it somehow. I'd suggest using a variable along these lines:



          blob :=
          VAR SettleDate = MAX ( factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE] )
          RETURN
          CALCULATE (
          SUM ( factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING] ),
          DATESBETWEEN (
          factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
          SettleDate - 27,
          SettleDate
          ),
          ALLEXCEPT (
          factService,
          factService[PRO_ID],
          factService[SER_ID],
          factService[LOC_ID_SELLING],
          factService[TIS_ID]
          )
          )


          Here the variable picks the maximal settlement date in the current filter context. If that's not exactly what you need, adjust the definition accordingly.






          share|improve this answer















          As the error mentions, the issue is with factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE]. In the measure, there is no row context so that it knows which date you are talking about, so you need to specify it somehow. I'd suggest using a variable along these lines:



          blob :=
          VAR SettleDate = MAX ( factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE] )
          RETURN
          CALCULATE (
          SUM ( factService[SRV_ADJUSTED_EARNING] ),
          DATESBETWEEN (
          factService[SETTLEMENT_DATE],
          SettleDate - 27,
          SettleDate
          ),
          ALLEXCEPT (
          factService,
          factService[PRO_ID],
          factService[SER_ID],
          factService[LOC_ID_SELLING],
          factService[TIS_ID]
          )
          )


          Here the variable picks the maximal settlement date in the current filter context. If that's not exactly what you need, adjust the definition accordingly.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 26 at 18:34

























          answered Mar 26 at 14:51









          Alexis OlsonAlexis Olson

          18.2k2 gold badges22 silver badges38 bronze badges




          18.2k2 gold badges22 silver badges38 bronze badges












          • Thanks for your response. That throws the error: "Semantic error: the first argument to "DATEADD" must specify a column. Also I am looking to take the dates 28 relative to the date in the row, so given Feb 28th that would be 1st to 28th Feb inclusive. Wouldn't the MAX take the largest date in the fact?

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 26 at 16:32












          • Ah, I forgot DATEADD needs a date column as the first argument. As far as the MAX goes, it takes the max in the current filter context, not necessarily over the whole fact table. Try my edit.

            – Alexis Olson
            Mar 26 at 18:34











          • Thanks again for the quick response. That solves the semantic error and you are correct that the MAX is in the filter context. I have created the calculated field and compared to the calculated column and the answers are the same, and I have marked your post as the correct answer. I trawled the net and the Russo/Ferrari book for an answer without joy so I cannot thank you enough for your post. Nice trick to use the variable to force the filter context - I won't forget that one.

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 27 at 9:59

















          • Thanks for your response. That throws the error: "Semantic error: the first argument to "DATEADD" must specify a column. Also I am looking to take the dates 28 relative to the date in the row, so given Feb 28th that would be 1st to 28th Feb inclusive. Wouldn't the MAX take the largest date in the fact?

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 26 at 16:32












          • Ah, I forgot DATEADD needs a date column as the first argument. As far as the MAX goes, it takes the max in the current filter context, not necessarily over the whole fact table. Try my edit.

            – Alexis Olson
            Mar 26 at 18:34











          • Thanks again for the quick response. That solves the semantic error and you are correct that the MAX is in the filter context. I have created the calculated field and compared to the calculated column and the answers are the same, and I have marked your post as the correct answer. I trawled the net and the Russo/Ferrari book for an answer without joy so I cannot thank you enough for your post. Nice trick to use the variable to force the filter context - I won't forget that one.

            – Stuart5069
            Mar 27 at 9:59
















          Thanks for your response. That throws the error: "Semantic error: the first argument to "DATEADD" must specify a column. Also I am looking to take the dates 28 relative to the date in the row, so given Feb 28th that would be 1st to 28th Feb inclusive. Wouldn't the MAX take the largest date in the fact?

          – Stuart5069
          Mar 26 at 16:32






          Thanks for your response. That throws the error: "Semantic error: the first argument to "DATEADD" must specify a column. Also I am looking to take the dates 28 relative to the date in the row, so given Feb 28th that would be 1st to 28th Feb inclusive. Wouldn't the MAX take the largest date in the fact?

          – Stuart5069
          Mar 26 at 16:32














          Ah, I forgot DATEADD needs a date column as the first argument. As far as the MAX goes, it takes the max in the current filter context, not necessarily over the whole fact table. Try my edit.

          – Alexis Olson
          Mar 26 at 18:34





          Ah, I forgot DATEADD needs a date column as the first argument. As far as the MAX goes, it takes the max in the current filter context, not necessarily over the whole fact table. Try my edit.

          – Alexis Olson
          Mar 26 at 18:34













          Thanks again for the quick response. That solves the semantic error and you are correct that the MAX is in the filter context. I have created the calculated field and compared to the calculated column and the answers are the same, and I have marked your post as the correct answer. I trawled the net and the Russo/Ferrari book for an answer without joy so I cannot thank you enough for your post. Nice trick to use the variable to force the filter context - I won't forget that one.

          – Stuart5069
          Mar 27 at 9:59





          Thanks again for the quick response. That solves the semantic error and you are correct that the MAX is in the filter context. I have created the calculated field and compared to the calculated column and the answers are the same, and I have marked your post as the correct answer. I trawled the net and the Russo/Ferrari book for an answer without joy so I cannot thank you enough for your post. Nice trick to use the variable to force the filter context - I won't forget that one.

          – Stuart5069
          Mar 27 at 9:59








          Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.







          Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55359816%2fdax-code-change-from-calculated-column-to-a-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현